| Show i r PARLEY lH r P BECAME Mf 6 I COURT U I II I I i Because Objection Was Raised To Introduction of Improper Testimony i Ii I IN PROSECUTION OF JONES County CUll it II t I tam er tt y I To 10 Mr Ih i Not Al bollt out of III Certain The case of ot William It It Jones Jr hard charged i with whit Rill anti grand larceny which wan wa In III Judge Di hl court and ml later upon of ot v P 1 tn coun ly I attorney candidate for tor or Congress I Mr HI and which case CAst was wall again revived bs b time the ame seine Parley P 1 Christensen n by b bythe u uthe I the filing of ot another complaint In Judge Dana Iana T 1 Smiths court C Url was as be begun b gun guim this till morning r WAS W AS WORSTED County Atty All Parley Parle P 1 candidate for or COli I etc was vas on hand hamad with nine witnesses Only tuo were put Pitt un on the III Mand when h 11 the prosecution Jump bumped up against It II hard hem There wa was AI hn Ian mix up Parley Perle P 1 Atty A II C e I tella n coun roun tol cl for tor the timi di n i In whIch Parley got ot the tho th worst or l of oC it It during the examination ot of John C chairman of the county former ormer D Demo mo tint crat and present Republican wherein Mackay attempted to In show shea the rule concerning the time purchase of ot supplies for or the county On direct examina examination lion tion Mr Ir Mackay was wan n naked kd If It he knew how certain articles were pur by I Mr Ir Jones He II 11 paid I he lid did and that f t his bla own on knowledge Alt tt Soren X N Christensen stated nat d that lie III would examine the Ihl witness lInes and we ee ce Just how ho much he ha did iid know Tak lag the complaint counsel for tor defense asked I ked HUT BUT MACKAY T KNOW ENOW With reference to this broken plate valued At nt 50 SO cents en I how hoi when and where wa wu It II Purchased Mackay IReka was III extremely he got red rd In the face ap expostulated and to 10 mak an atm explanation Parley Parl P J I objected to the but the court overruled the objection Coun K tl for tor defense dIen e then than enumerated s fe ser v ml Hal other article such as IU a 1 broken knife a II tea strainer nn an old tumbler and some shoe hol strings airings etc te and naked If Ir witness knott knI anything about thorn thOlO or any other articles article mentioned In tlc the complaint After Arter a long Ion I wrangle Mr Mackay admitted that he did not nol of at Ills his hat own knowledge e know about them hem Ih m COUNTY COl TY ATTORNEY ANGRY any The result of th time mix jap angered Parley Parle P greatly gle tl With lIh Bl Blazing tI ayes and amid shaking hand he roared d to counsel councel I Ilor for lor defense li You rant cant rule TIllS THIS court nor the I county attorneys Counsel for defense defence smiled and Judge Dana T Smith remarked Inadvertent tent remarks will have han no effect on this I court u liS I propose to 10 hear the case C e strictly on its merits merll and according to toI law I aqil the rules Of or evidence To every avery question taut put to Mackay If It Ithe he knew of his own oun knowledge how when or where hert any article mentioned l lIn In the lie complaint was purchased Mao MM I kai ka Xo No 0 lie He finally ad admit mit tod that lie ho knew nothing about It Mr Ir Mackay was then excused 1 TIlE THE The next witness was rank Frank n botham bolham deputy county auditor Hi lii i iWI I was WI shown a voucher and anal Identified the signature of Mr Ir Jones Jon I thereon Time TIll I effort to Introduce the voucher failed allM I because the articles mentioned In ira the voucher were r not named lit In the th rom corn complaint plaint The prosecution pro lutlo then produced luceda a voucher outher for tor nen for tor the purchase I of ot articles from the King Hardware company compan among amonI the article named on ona ona I a bill lath attached to the voucher was one refrigerator I PARLEY PARL Y PLEADS FOR FOU TIME TI IE The introduction of o the two t lO docu doeu documents ments was U objected to on the th ground that did not know kno of ot oti i his hi own Otil knowledge that the time articles mentioned In the th bill were nr the same lame an as that Ihal called for lor In the voucher The ob obi i was a sustained by the court ourt but Parley Pari P 1 pleaded tu to the court to take lak j I II Ithe I the th matter under until I thu afternoon Judge Smith stated tal 1 I t several teral times lines Um that hat the voucher outher itself i did tact not prove ownership by b the county count 1 j and anal that time Ule witness of ot his ht own know knowledge lodge ledge did not know anything about It The rhe matter will be finally ruled on nn anthis this afternoon when County Attorney Parley Parte P 1 I etc ste 11 will pre present sent authorities on 01 his bis contention that the r and the court can nn presume evidence against III de defendant d defendant |
