| Show t REMANDED fM n nf H f FOR NE tW 1 TRIAL I l Judgment of Lower Court Re Reversed Reversed Reversed versed By Supreme Tribunal I I I MRS MARTHA PRICE VS FLOYD I lol In II I ii Ju J tIl or Hut t It I I I l h Vim Iho l WI Nut ul The Tit supreme court curt taa tOa today y reversed the te Judgment of ot the lower court In La 1 the case of or Martha Price Pric against John II I Lloyd of the estate atte of William Wilam Lloyd deceased appellant and re rema re ma mald mended the thu ea rUI case for tor a new nw 1 Th The Thea al a lion wits nun brought to 10 compel the th pe p performance of a 1 parol agreement fir fr r the Ihl of a part Rrt of ot tot lot Jt 7 i block blk tj r MI i 8 Salt lt ll Lake Lalie Lk City I survey the tho lower court ourt rendered n a tf in II favor I of ot and awarded her the prop prot ro tty efty ett Involved Plaintiff In the hf case rase 14 married the ton eon tonof of William Lloyd but tait bt afterwards se secured t cured lurf a divorce from him and married nor her pr present ent h ithe ht was wag A also all the niece nIce lr f t Mr r Lyt and Ind nd she the alleged in itt II her bet complaInt that prior to t July Jul ISM ulie III iii for lor Mr r Lloyd and aM a in oon on of ot her action In that he hp told her hr in ri the month stated above that he would gite gl her the th lot which she nhe 11 now and an tId l her to move In lit li and Rn fix It Il up u It is II yours oun I want to 10 retain retail the Ih title Ile to 10 t It until I die di but lul It II hall chili Ihn he h yours OU from this on Prior to 10 the Ibe time mentioned and aft afterwards aC UP to the time tle of Mr Ir Lloyds death plaintiff alleged that Ihal she nhe washed Mho and mended his hi clothes cooked and lm for tor him anti and nt that ehe fhe fully ful com eoin compiled cm plied piled Ie with lb the I th ht rol contract on ott her part he also 11 put UI Improvements on th tho thu of the value of 2000 10 and hue hill hi po se iton of It ever IUN July Jut mn Upon hH hit hl however his bl ex cx orator refuted refused fd to transfer master the tl property to 10 her hr SAd and Id hence hell the Ih stilt milt was U tiled filed to 10 compel him to comply with lh the Ihl terms of the Hlf parol agreement of SIft gift made md by Mr dr Ir Lloyd The Te lower court curt found In tn her favor lavor I but bul the supreme cUrt court url holds that the th j j I evidence Wits was POt not nt it to show that thata I H a failure to p lly perform the pa parol I Irol rol agreement gre ment of o gift perpetrated ler a af f upon her mr antI and Inflicted unjust and unconscionable Injury and Ions to tier her herand and hence henl the Ih agreement IK Is II not hot re ri removed rl 1111 moved front from the statute of frauds fraud and the judgment of the tho lower loner court Murt should boull I be lie h reversed nod and a 1 new trial granted The Th opinion of the Ibe court was al written by b Justice Ju lc anti and concurred In II by b bI byI Carty Catty I Justice anti Justice Me I |
