| Show i rA l n rs I I JO S G St Confidentially Tells Tribune Man He Will Try It in Another Court HE CUTS OUT JUDGE DIEHL Sustaining of an Objection by the Defense Causes Him to Be Become Become Become come Personally Piqued XII 11 That Riven GIrn to tn He Bc porter of Paper Called Ills III hII Count Allys Atts The ease In against William II It Jonet Jr former superintendent of the count Infirmary a of and anti grand larceny In ny reached a n sudden n term termination In Judge C B court Ibis this morning amid ami In favor faor of ot Mr Ir Jones Jone iJ When the case calle was begun on Friday morning County Count Alty Atty AIt Parley P 1 Chris brie tenseR begun the prosecution by trying to Introduce In evidence various vouch ouch irs purporting to 10 show how that certain articles had been purchased by the county Prior to 10 this hits he hUll hail failed In 10 1 show ownership p of ot r ald stahl articles or that anything had been he en misappropriated SUSTAINED Coun l for tor Mr Ir Jones J Atty It Soren Foren X ii promptly objected to the Introduction of ot the th vouchers on the ground that miTch evidence was im immaterial material Judge Diehl took the matter mailer under advisement until thin this morning when whetu he lie sustained the objection ob Uon 1 CASE ASE SE DIS Without a single word of explanation tion tiomi County Attorney Parley larley P Chi hi arose to his lofty height it 1 said fold j jI foldI saidI I move mo e that the ease raae against Jones be dismissed ecI It was promptly dig die i by the court and Mr Junes Junell was n discharged WILL lII TRY TRi AGAIN AGAI lAter inter It developed d that Parley Parle P Is not lint yet t satisfied and lint proposes propose to take further steps sLot In III the matter but for what reason his hili friends cannot under understand understand stand tand 1 IN 1 ANOTHER COURT To a representative of the Ameri American can party part p rt organ Parley confided that If Judge Diehl sustained the objection raised by counsel for defense de tense lie hue Par Parley j jIe icy ley Ie P would tile file a IL anew new M complaint IN I 1 ANOTHER COURT presumably be bt before befort fort fore Judge Dana DaM T Smith It is a singular that only une one witness for tor forthe or orthe the prosecution on was 18 present this morn mornIng ItI tind he hl did lag Ing nit net testify o ASKS 81 8 WHY HY 1 Naturally the question arises arl e If Jt the time It county Duet attorney had a case can t Mr Ir Joists why wh did he ask fiRk for tor n a dismissal i of ot the Again If It he II did not nol I have hae a ce rae ea e why h he attempt to If It hi he did IUd not have hue a ease case ca e In Judge Jud JudI I court lO rt why does he want to file tilt filean filea an all a action atlon In another court If H he lie dt dM have hf ji a r caSt ratto did be hI not prosecute ule It ItIn ItIn Itin In Judge JudE court HARD NITS TO CRACK BACK I IrhE These rhE questions may m be as hard hanl of ot explanation for the tM reason uon th tIme the county attorney ell a charge of ot murder In tl 11 flint fist degree II mind nd permitted tI tb accused J to plead guilty to a charge of 0 assault and anti battery slid and lId pay Illy a nile flue of or JIM S |
