| Show JUDGMENT JUDG tENT AFFIRMED I Court curt mi 1111 Cu ie c of Tami I HIT r IN h tirI The supreme court ourt today the IheI I if f the lower lowet court ourt In the theca I ca CU of Caleb all Tanner vi n J A i Idward stale auditor appellant and Ihu thus decides the Ih us sac t it whether Mr Tanner Tann r Is II to hi hIs Jar from March Ii U 1 to 10 S IH 1 or whether It U should have 1 been Wen paid 14 to 10 former fonner taIe r A 1 f I ac actually tn lly performed the UI of tile the of or flee It during that period The Involved i u II and the supreme IU urt oh holds hoo hol that Mr rr Tanner Is ii I entitled to the th nun money Inasmuch aa II hi his bill appoint mem ment had been confirmed and he hf wee was legally the III state engineer although he aW did not take lake actual charge of ot the om e C until March Zi n It It II held that the ute JUlIe auditor erred d In paying th Ih the mono mon monI n 11 I to Mr Ir Dor mus who performed th the duties of or the th office Chief Olet wrote te the Ih of af the court Our which was a concurred in II by hy his hll H W Sat I |