| Show D. D R. R G. G TV Y TELLS I. I X c C. C CLAIM AIM OX 0 USE OF OP MOFFAT AT 1 TUNNEL v Denver envier er Rio Grande Western Weste n oid haf hailed ha l tl with wilh the Jc ft I i ie commission l a n brief brief da S. S PJ P- P J r of 1 its its i to obtain gc 1 i tall f q operate t t f Ver er l 1110 idle tiie Delver Jo l nil 11 1 rI It take ak Gern VS- VS railroad 41 n ci 4 au- au t 1 t I t nel il i 1 o. o R it T alt t i le h l ne l ti PP ill I 1 ibri ful l if i th to j e nu extension froin Dotsero to toBb toI I Bb d' d l Tr r- r tJi I to anda amla and ald a n. n re I gift by h com commission si u agents en aided that the tho o ii Grande f rights rig ts over the Salt rl Lake l system y s 's r as ah an exchange ex-chango Dor t-Jr the exten- exten exten- exten p-M p i o ol l. l rights ight T The sit Salt i LaIc i company o w i tI the extension of of tI lights bights t t tta the Rio nil Grande The time Ume has co cacti cacti- e when tho iho h D Denver n and ami Salt Lake c cannot act as the del delegated mouthpiece of or the pub the pub pub- 1 lie lic is and and the th the ta taxpayer payer th the H td Grande rando brief declare art after l' l explaining explain explain- ing that the Moffat t tm tunnel n l was a a. publicly puh cly fi financed enterprise se although leased by hy the Salt Lake I |
