| Show SUIT BROUGHT BROUGHT AGAINST AGAINST WELLS FARGO EXPRESS CO CONw COw New Nw w York Y rk July Dudtey B Evans Enn an and Homer D B Parsons Parson pee tec 1 of ot the Velia Kar Jar Fargo o Express I company were cre ere made defendants defendant today in an Rn af action Atlon brought br ht In tn the supreme I In Brooklyn by H W Porn Pom I i cray eror and Albert Albrt Jo Josephson two to stock holders holder bd fU for lor a f p peremptory wrIt HI of man mun i damus damu compelling them to submit to toan toan toan an examination of the tha looks lk of ot the ther cOrporation r The T plaintiffs raid paid that tat they r rrt rt M H 4 per pr cent of the thi tock stock of ot the I After hiring hering the tho arguments th the I court decision Counsel for tor the plaintiffs plaintiff declared d laud In his argument h I that thai tha they tIme the lave Jn received rc ltd of j only S I per r cent while they had r uon I II I 1 I to lo Mine believe It I should b O n I per I r cent c I Counsel also al said Mid ud that a committee was wasI nt I I recently formed tor if tf nt get Information i about abut the Ih affairs of ot the h company cra t lot But l I had only ony an aa Nta H M as a l carted that for or the last lut nyc fo years the tho corporation had been ben under the Ih nation of one man HP lie 11 said Mil sat the surplus sas wac wal stated d to 10 be 00 when It I WM probably II bl Anti and tho amoUnt of bonds mis wn uns I I VIII as tie al M 01 when hn would Iw li nearer correct The attorney said M the defense II l p rIP that the plaintiff represent a astock 1 stork stock brokerage nr firm and wanted to control tot tore the tho coinIng election of ot diree director At every rr annual annuit 1 meeting of ot the rom corn company pan pany H it I was a said full and correct r statements tatem l 1 Issued ull as all to the financial condition of o the th company They Th al aIM I contended that tho the charter of at the tho th cor corporation cr corporation j had been obtained In Colorado Colordo I and that the court COUtt had ha no mm Jurisdiction to 10 enforce the te inspection of booKs boks of ot a I company of or another state |
