| Show b HH USE WIT i r y O E Delegate Smith of Arizona Made MadeI I Insinuations About Agree Agreement mont ment on Statehood I STIRRED SPEAKER CANNON 7 i He d JIll Ill Cutoff at and WI V tU IU tUI i irh rh herNI r l lie H I i i SH Down June Jun In re j hll hk 4 Ule t cf 4 wit Hit 11 f Uld a more mor acene than it today Incident to the uen of oC o Ibe th conference report on tte tato tatoI Hood At Ju Ibe tb dOH of ot a dy de do deon clete doI I I tt te on O the aundry civil bill the leo ItO 1 survey auney urve occupying the major por tsan of ot the lb lime time Mr Ir fr Hamilton of MUn ISkra MUnI I pan chairman of toe the committee on un unI II I ts i called up the conference re rt repart P part on the statehood bill Mil In anthi lion of inott of 01 1 r I tb member were In their a ata al while tilt te t Ii ei were tilled tilledA I A round of ahr Ib the Ihl mn an n nf or the th committee when he h hethe mo 1 tHe Uti adoption of the I h report Earlier Hi iii ii tM tile day da he bt had bad endeavored lid orf to lu cull cittI jp rip UK UH report but bUl found that Ibal the Ih pa pi r rhad had 1111 ad not 1101 reached the hou from the I h I At AI t that thu time he Mated Ih l li liiM lie he lieI I iM 4 not any ay debate I t that the Ih report would be lt It ItI out alit I While there Ihre w wa no 1 I on on oil th tile report hull l a unexpected p Mr lr MOM of the ranking member of ot the lb minority on ott the th commit t Ie e on had bed made mM a state atte sI tiet In 1011 to the Ih petition of ur the Ih Democrat en ii 11 the tilt com prom toe agre 1 i upon liven in tf jj fl Ue was waa fre fr frequently H nUY t with wilh U aj thou then tilt f i 1 i 1 Iy Mr 11 x A I c 1 gI from trum Arisona l who wh h took oc 00 Jj In It guarded way to 10 1 that thuit there the ItAI been undue Influence Innel iid In r jn in fl agreement Smarting wider what be he to tol 0 l 10 be c It n dir i t insinuation In a him Sneaker H I In ii left I tile 1 i I hiIr t Ir Mr ir to 10 the Ih dm dt ini IRk 11 It t I In th aN all i pi the Ih t sIt at 1 which he hi h v ue J t d for or Ind I rare eart N until he tie l k l 1 the tM pro t tit for five t I explain hit hi n f i 1 f greeted the theAt lb I At eaker an I hr lu Stood tood with Ith hand i uplifted l hili l i Id J shaking trailing roy or i quiet In the tue hoime inu Again Aln and nd again 1 i 1 a ee of fit an over orr the 1 chamber Chab r Democrats and nd Republican I I It Finch I lIa II order war wall ind then Ihn 1 n every eer word br et Cannon onnon Rid ald di Mr jr r Speaker as co a member of ot the Ih tU houe of nt during this tb I cit as a at 1 all 11 other sessions 1011 I 1 hare bae t and eM acted for tor or w the II whole hol people ll to In my m est beat I d judgment The c kilo Into the Union I 4 c j of or Oklahoma ant ami III Indian Territory ry I IJ J p j meets my m tI I If I hud had my lilY iy ch hII i 11 i re supreme I J would ouId Infinitely j I prefer Irr lo to see NC Oklahoma and nd the tM Indian InJian f 1 Territory come ime In with I i 1 I population of two and one nn ni j half million willi four senators rill IJ I i rr than Ihan to III to see ece S N n Meilen and nine me together and God knows kM Si i 4 than to cee H ee com singly with t u l 1 J about and four lour ain sen ainI n I r My M I views 1 irP H not nol secret I hat hav ha hati I Iu i I t u hl to In the th Ih lesi I of f my m belief ti to voice i r them You have h the result before you ru ruI I i Although every Ct man In the hI Indian Ter Tn Teri 1 i should vote statehood for fori i f Jl t 2 tile the tu proposed state itt 11 nf of Oklahoma j notwithstanding that protest the tv 4 I w uld kI b be and will be formed under this t I I WI act acts Ct Ctt i s t tr Smith of I rose mae J Mr Ir I do not yield III at this Ihl Ihli i Ther Is II I no nn separate vets MAl t w thore Ik ere There Tbt Is Ii I a i vote ot iE as 5 to 10 the other two So 10 o much f fr r ri i f Itt 1 I do 40 not pm Olt to 0 go IG Into Inlo the merits of this proposition I would not notia have MI ia taken n the floor had hall not rot the lion hon bant t t raW rable rut gentleman the t hI delegate dIste from Arisen Mr Mt Smith made mad the remark V i that there waa wai I a high p nally the 1 s 1 t of If that thaI territory to tn attempt to 10 toI I legislation or nr for fur one ouie legis fria legislative 4 3 s i S body bodI or Na Its M membership memI tn In at AI j r tempt to o hulk In the tilt legislation mith alib alibI It ItU h I U r hi In order 1 to leg i I If It I t correctly state elate Mm him That lust remark could DUIt have III ha c Wr I UK one motive and aM one meaning an nn and andL l that IMI meaning Is Ia I that sonic some one In III ii tin h j I Iw a w L n hii has h he sought to Ic I affect tJ O OIn ii 1 In hi the house houll n II a mIter matter of It traffic In Iii Inora 41 ora r 10 to sure secure ui upon mi this thu mIte mat matter 4 11 ter hr II In hi the senate That ThI Imputation n tin lin In III so 10 far tr as a It reflects upon th tM the I tt of this house bouse and n m pa far r as ft I t tJ i I 1 know kw or r e upon any n other mem meun member ri J I her ber of ot tit this house lieu Is Ie an unworthy wort by of the I t I IJ It n that It and without f Uon In fat fact Loud lLoud applause t f 4 I If U It I waa w u a necessary to furnish proof pan I of M this tl statement I look about me mt Pure here hereon P on Ott my ow SWO n 11 sM ie of 4 tM the Maw house on n mew mesa In Int f t hove berf with ella whom I d J i 4 the I progress of f the bill from time In to time and upon n the ItI other side aide d of ef the t 11 and net I pave pause and an nl Invite any n I t r present who ho has ha the least lesat I t gj ties t knowledge or Of eve 40 ee belief that tl tie tieM e M Implied In tn the Ih InsInuation p of it the u i ii true lo to say uy lilt so 10 l When Speaker I tr Cannon aenon finished th tu husse it was as fa 10 an Iii uproar It t could y 1 nt t 1 c tip tie I nor did the M 11 MS S It make lUke ke any effort rt to 10 d do HO in Members 1 wits who had d sat lit In silence during the lo le loll ll II livery very of or the speech Democrats Democrat It t n l He Re H HI Rek k I crowded e around the t speaker to 10 Mke Mm him by br the III hand bauM ml nI 1 4 tell him how bow rIM glad they were that thai the th thu bt 1 ii lenir u drawn out OUI l it for toe hd ia 1 J l i 11 Wee happily P I ended 4 In a compromise i not and that hat his bl speech voiced OI th the nl m most Ms of nC th thu members s Mr Moon loon In is ii th lilt view tew of If the tilt minority said t J Mr r Speaker the controversy be hf between bea a tween I th 0 the two t parties In tn this house boUlt at t I lilt th admission of the of Art Arti ArtL L at i z am ant and M tew Nn Mexico 1 and Oklahoma I awl II Indian Territory has bu bee MM bees very T arid and nd strong fin far fn some year tan past rut 4 Ti IK IN moors 11 party ny ha lIa felt fl that It ItI nan II to the Interest of tf the State i I i 1 I t Ii 11 HI Mt H the III of f power between the I f 1 e I m might hl be he preserved I is tilt the fed f fit it P f HI nate with four Mates being hin made f I t f lr id d of or tw IYo ef f these th territories Rat But BittI d I 6 Li Jr ft I If t of fit the Ih case i ot I It f t a l OJ I 1 and Indian Territory we weI i i I 1 wen tr confronted with pith lIb the If that I I I h 11 bee always al been sacred N to the Demo I j Ip ft Ut party the th demand Hn of af the II III people I I ot If theo the III t two 10 o territories nr statehood I t our ur 01 views III la that ih I rote of nf tile the I II ti pe peo fie might I p r I J be two heard heerd h the minority nf of r fh th It 1 I tee ls t on nn readily a t to In the Ih IhY i Y nt nf t the Ih majority fn nr in the i z of ol Oklahoma labona and HI the ne in I I diati Por Jor r in lh for rv tv tea sea seas 11 I IMa Ij j Ma s that we t aeed to 10 the t uni n nf of 0 j I I the two tan ll wo W hav ha havI op Orl I the tIN union of An and nd N Sf Nw I kit I it II sac a to I u I Ih ib ibI I r those in I n tint ot d sire I in ut inn irn and lid p e nit felt that It II was a t the Ihl principles nf of f government the I he lh Ih I ry s tf If f parties to I fir tn fl unwelcome union upon two territories A We Wt said 1 that thai Dili Ihl house bouse ought not nl to 10 enforce the union of 01 these two Iwo tern lurl iMie e We W yaw saw A this house vote us d wa n os nil a the bf I majority of nl the committee had done don Again Aln in conference alter after th Ih the bill hill isme train from t the tb senate we t saw 1111 the of or the nil house sustained by II a majority of or the Ibe conferees and then Iha Mr lr ker we lle that thai wiil h seldom hat has occurred IB lii this ibis or orny any ny other bod body Delegate mith followed Mr Wr OO and In his hia speech to which the th tb speaker er took umbrage umbrI he said Mr lr Ir ker three that limes t the ht he house boUle of f representative tc and once Republican we have hao In passing pallin bills bill for lor iii I h creation of 01 separate states of New 0 and aud The lea leu st ld about ab ul the till way this Ihl bill has hall fared faJt l th the better for tor th the history r of this Ihl Congress Co rN There Thull la II I a law In in Anion MIlO that thai If It Iton one on legislator trades with another on the tho legislation before that body he ho li I 1 guilty of ot a very huh high O and alki If the th governor shall attempt In that benighted territory to Influence leg 1 station by b promise premise prom of ot a veto 10 or th the withholding of a s veto 10 to Ie secure other he h goes to 10 the penitentiary I 1 congratulate Attson thanking the th house hove for what whal It II has h done and we shill shall at 1 the tM nest neat session of 06 this ton COn tress when bl the lbS Ih election re returns r turns are art shown hon demonstrate to 10 this Ihl house bou whether In spite of or I ron reite to 10 be bt a ii bribe of or in hl bill billand and I rejected that before tb committee we have ha people above abo such tuch considerations I have no doubt we shall hall come coin bark back with such eb veto on Oft th the for tor Arizona and New dew 21 exl to 1 Q 1 Applause on th the Democratic aide sIde |
