Deseret Evening News | 1906-04-19 | Page 20 | Two Opinions Given

TWO OPINIONS GIVEN Sill Court oit rE I es Oln n e 11 t T Two IWI opinions were sero handed down Iown liy 11 Ii tin Ih In yesterday afternoon one title ut of f which was 11 a n 11 and the trie 1111 an all I tion of or the tue Judgment ot of if the Ih lower In II the thu case cne cl e ot nf Rich Jeh ud ant Howe 1111 loWI Isaac I nao S anti and Thomas Jeremy tl Judg of ot the lower wan IR and it ii I ni 11 trial rial grunted granted gan I I ld The action vas brought ht to Ii Itc WIS Itol er on 0 n 0 deficiency judgment rendered In lii II favor to VOl of ot appellant m on n a suit stilt The respondents that the Judgment vise urn barred by b the tho statute of or limitations md Ind the Ih lower luver court derided In their thir favor to 01 The Tue ho point Involve 1 Is I tiit hit of or limitations began to 10 inn un trout rom tho the dale the tho amount of l the time dell deO entered m in 11 the ease US or 01 whether It I ran mn from he ho data dato the amount of ot the thin tied dell deficiency Judgment wits was Wil determined Thu Tho lower loner held that It II ran trout from tWi the he Into ditto It ft time the original decree dool aiM thus thuir tile Iho ho action on OIl UI time the Judgment was Wil barred The TIte supreme court ourt how however ever Clr holds that Ihal the tho statute does riot not begun beun to run rUI until the amount of ot tile the deficiency Judgment Is II determined hence time the Ihl action of oC appellant was WIK wa not mint halted Tile The h Judgment In II i therefore re reversed versed verned with wih Instructions to 10 grant 11 I t a it anew Justice new hew trial The opinion was ts written by ly In iii tile the cane r c of ft if John Y e Rich against the Utah U taim Commercial I Savings a bank appellant tire the Judgment of ot Iho tho I Ito lower court 1 was ns Tile The le action attio was os brought to II recover lecover l head hend of t sheep Which It I was WIS claimed 00 unlawfully converted by h time the th bank The fhe lower rendered Judgment In Ili favor tavor of o plaintiff 1411 iii I itt and thin thi It Judgment J la itt now how af if b ii the court coul