| Show jiRs ASK mR Requested State Board to Re Restore Restore Restore store Price to Per Acre OTHER SIDE HEARD FROM FROMI of IsI tI I II ill lit Will I r for falor or lo to Motion or Of hili Curried br tr to 12 1 ur fIr tr the matter mattel at ut con COli nt ut theIr In Inh hall hail Saturday afternoon legislative ht h 1 he county commissioner arid artt laud laudO Inn of or O H th state voted In III favor nOl of ot the tilO board hoad of ut land loll rR to 10 store the Iho of omnI lands s to II I 60 M Q per pcr acre Instead Iii tead tift the Iha ad all adM nomine It to II remain at nt r f M rr of If t 1260 20 2 O per pel nero acre us U IU 11 d 1 a L car ago the th borl over I year ClO HeNf y lure re present nt it lt the meeting V 0 nit nUl of the 27 counties In lit the thethis lii rm sip aM this vote yote on tho the motion motol ulc Ir for or I restoration 1 of or the of or orM h nf M until Tain v s 20 to 10 12 1 Members of nr it the state boi bo bod rd ri of land commissioners tt in Inu ere pr Si nt it lt and aud made Il price of the u ivor r of Ite the he present tie A umI Ut or the counties not hot Nr i communications stating hit ht th verc I re rc I In sympathy with the Iho theto ha ItH 1 to reduce the Iho price of Its Is figure IFT OK 01 01 Th Tb n ting HUB lg was vua IS railed called to tl Ii order ord r by b ot or Juab Juabn anI n t 10 stated the thO object of the thet t He le said In part Ever the mine rale In the price of and nd b bv lie tt hI haiti board we WO have hae een tn D why the price of ot mate tute land ad The fhe total wiles eilea In 1905 1105 PO WAr Wr only lilly he amount t old nold under ii the ll t old price it U II in I n t vital iol question Wo o In luab Juab Il a large area and much imich q f th h i ht F mi ii In II far fil from nil lIia I roads 1 s saIr and ald aIr vt 1 lle tw Ih experiment hy by tin tIll tate ti I Is m tn dry bY farming have havo hlo IgI 1 ui US U to to take lul e huld and an raise dry lr rop Th hp rise m rl In III the price of land has haM hal Hopped he ftc Ih purchase l of Ut lands land Poor Ioor POOl wr topic t afford to It now Its Iti I ill IH II for or the largo large because bealo h I cnn mn put t In pipe pip lines and set Act et ater alfr to il 11 clop loII the Ihl I h lind It I I t v s on OU I of ot sentiment that hiM wo wa 0 were vre to out olt letters for fil or a rt meeting 1 protest pi against tim the of or the tho dat ate iiiI board The he board bouril says aya aH It ItI Ita 19 I a n nb M land left Idt yet t the l show ut w in there ther wore nearly half haU a It 1101 acres arr ar of lands available Bu for tor lt so wt Ion on it alto ilo arable school lands landl lat at al were fr misled of acri aCI Th The t of lf Ir county lount In Inn II leading hit his movement nio n Is II i to tl get geL ct the price re to tl lured lue bark lalk to St iv We 1 f vl 1 hat that I a II I protest prole 1 should houll be ht ti ad de a iJ i d It t tat t u committed I t to shout should ti ho tn h M present It to 10 thu Ihl land board ud td the governor MR IVANS A At t o of or hiM remark Mr tr Ir tIun led Abel hel John ohl of or ih dh 01 I M S in II lt chairman chi U J I Eun E a iv 0 is lii elected hy by h thu th unnI on vote rute of o tin Ih convention A M SI Lo of ur 1111 county wax Wil VC thou then hon boon ho nn 8 I tf e b rotary by hy I a ft I unanimous Th Tb roll rII 11 was waR wa thou then thel by 1 h i nd e present JI sen responded IC Iol ed edI IV I i h bi b i half lif I I f of tilt Ihl t county fOUlly IOU coal in Is Io r rs or IH t 5 representatives of nf come raIz 1 H ii I in tO II thu tho county The he re no reul 10 ul UI ut of th tb roll cull WIK va as IM 11 ft r i a John F V Tolton C e IJ Mur If Ir v J M I Murdock t l I J P Holm HolmI 1011 I lj a 3 ir 11 t arbori lahon it II W v V Crockett t l IS Krow irow Jens Nelson lum Im II I Lr Ir A N 4 Leonard Andrew AI Not Noti i II i Ii In m Howard I ri i A 1 Johnson on D P If I I nl i l 1 Hey wood i I Letter In II favor of lt If proposition r U Iron I T M I n Joseph Jo eph S Dei DeiH n l lR H s T L 14 1 W 1 Jonet M 1 D U 1 Tri Trl i 1 Thorley H II I W Lund Jui t urge Cule J J W V r L i t Umi 11 John jin Cooper W L I h Croft IJan i I l Ku L II in n favor Coor of proposition loF r U MBa MII VV W V II 11 I Toone Toon M u it I T 1 I c 1 t Call Is r Puh uti Not ot Hi L n 1 i It If I J Ilu el Joseph Joseh Hodges loI loIdl sn dl in Ji Lotter Leter In favor faor of tl tJ i 11 S M I p n ner P V I P r Tuttle M Mn J Jd n in d I J A d 1 S ik ak W n D 1 llon H l i D Mil MIt 1 VI Morton Jensen J emel Gorge George Tea T n nS S IIII t C William A k 1 inn 0 T r Nit St jt represented I i A Abol Abet John Inn t I In lii II favor favorY Y t tv t tm Thomas R E F K IF KJ HW W J v Mi Letter I In I favor fn avor or Ih b W V y 0 Charles A I In It k loop r Challes Wita iM I A I 1 M I SIO lmH I T D DI I A t ro l I lu In of ot tIle the tilo roll coil call calla a tIna hll expressed his hl views in I a JT r if r restoring th former price of nt 10 Id L iJ J I but IJ lt of the tho opinion that rn 11 of the state hoard 01 ot ma M maTh should bo 10 ii present t i III I IIII motion of or Mr lr f 4 county a COOl com COI tl rh t d wad WiH apI appointed to 10 In Ini i rs of or the board bord to attend nl In nr o Tha riu fh committee noon rt I r I WI aI with lh It vCr all ni uI eol of ot the th 1 Th I ih i hI e land board hoard of the board Loa rJ Mr I r W IV J 3 he n ii I ate ule that the thue board had ha not noti e 1 J i 4 d of the of or th lh f g nul rJ J would therefore like Ik rj J n n matr laler J K J I Tolton Totton of I hlen lue ll rl Informed corn com cm piMon I f rs that hat It was tile the general C IK be IKi hI m r fl or of f the Ihl state that thal thale 10 i e a f n V I nf f the Iho hi Iii 11 Increasing Isn I or of slate state lands from lit t to toi 10 i z 7 t II i w Wil ding the recta il I i I n of ot arid Mid lands q the Purpose of tho thio meetIng J 1 f IP tn I r rom Ol tho Iho member of the tle board boama bOllo 10 to the mutter f muter IV ItI I I o fler W V I U D then ther ther lit of the board In lit 11 re hI n o i th h ln ei which h leh Im Ito con j ir f 0 1 He M thai that V did what hiat the they con conI itt iI r nil ht hI best bt Interests of or th tin I I If ln In eased res the Ihl of or orr tiM r nI A haliL us Juno June JUle when heri Iho tho Ilo In l 1 ei 1 I made marf HO hb said that nera hari hn If hel Ill I of t t th e r l rv nor oer tC month and anc In rr hui u realized an un Increased I In III t sale sal k t te alf of or the land landi Ilmi 01 ot otI I J I VT 10 Rom om omu of or th the hand lond bought 1 r Irre ero cannot annot row now bo hu pur purt tm ci n the th owner at lt fO lift St 10 ner pel acre ocr t ju 1 h ha landu landi ore are nt good 1 b bi a ar 0 In 10 vil 1 Pi c thaL the notion action of o b 11 I IM tn in Illon ot If r M j lnA the Nie pr per St It John ohn Decry Dixon of lImo tho land hamal In ld board boar was IUS as the next let to lo malto mallo a U statement In II support of or the tho boards ac action le tion tol He Ito Mild nId Ihl that thaI out of ot o nil all ni govern KOern government merit ment lent landH to 10 Utah there thel re rc remained inn but hit t about aboul ut butt L a n million lion and II it Li Ii a If Ic to be ho hu divided among alon 1 state Ital lund land ho Il paid 11 pa Itt 1 could ea ly he lie sold oitt eol fur for fiO M or I per l acre and If It I the tho board would cell bell el It for fOI or tiny any tees less 1 S It would ha ho lu taking that much away front from the thu people In lii general who lio are uru taxed Thu Tue h hUM has only 11 about COO OO ot or lieu lel II hut lid Crol which H heel 11 null he tutu lu made nia do In 11 I t i Idaho T hIi lahl ho tin Ialo lands Idl toIl for or the Ihl th minimum pilro in of or 10 0 per acre OCle and tutu the WIH wal of or tho opinion that rtuh I ha tutt MIt nUll I certainly be worth ro per acre John Juhn C e la kot t of Ut If SO 01 nult county lou ii t y that tho the action of tho tito hoard board wax IS detrimental to tl tt the Interest ut If th the armel armors In iii this title county cOUlt as at In II h only 11 n a L very ery er poor quality of nf state land left kit lef and It Is hi II not worth more mie thin from Jl 1 to 2 1 per acre Ho Ito 11 thought that Itt thit tl minimum nI mum price IN n 1 anil ali thu thu u maximum V E S per aero acre Commissioner Hayes In I taye el of ot the hoard board paid Mid that the hoard board had Ind placed 1 a 11 price In Ie of 51 H 1 per pel ucro lero on oil 01 point school lundu In II Summit and 1111 It had boon ap tip d at nt less leaK than Ihal that nm and It cost fully Cul 1 per acre lNe to 10 run ruit rUI It I through the of or the tIlO He lie le that the Ihland land hand was Wn not worth anything If Ir It I was WIS uis not hut worth p Per Ier r acre asi as I at nl the rate into the theland theland land would woul all 11 bo hue Rom gone In iii II about almut 30 o I months he lie believed It the thc duty dUI of tho board to get an tie lood a n price aa as Il pos 15 possible sible for tor It Ol l J r I Call Col of ot county coull wan opposed et to tho the Increased price pill und and argued that It II shut out ont the poor farmer and 11 1 allowed large lar e corporations to 10 secure choice lands landH Many Mi I of the Iho people could not afford to 10 pay Ilay nw per ier acre and then have to 10 pay PY for Or water vater for Cor Irrigating Irrl It The hl increased price was strongly op nil opposed posed by b T I 1 C 7 1 lalister of or Millard county count Ho 10 saId that there are aro many people In his huls county COUII who Imo veru eager to get IC a n small tract of laud lind for fOl or a n home hOI hut they could not flOt afford to In pay tl per pcr Lucre ucro for or the land and thru S 5 i per er acre for water vator for tOI It I He I 11 argued that It If the thc board should hould soil land to O peo people f O pie pIc who Iho want homes and anI would pay UCO GO per acre lele for It I and It the tho taxes on the Ih land 1 would within a short time lute t amount a a t to more 1110 re than I U the II I Ia Increased ed male nale price which the tho board hat ha M fixed II on tho land ha till William Wiliam Howard 1 ot of Emory Emery county was sui s la it bun o opposed 11 to III the t lie Increased I price Ho Ito 10 tall Mild full that dry dr farming had not nol been beena a n In lit II his hIt county tind 11 1 that waa another reason rel on why uli the lower hurko should be he restored He le I to contended that hOt If It time the price was as induced to Its ls former format rate mat n It I I t would greatly gloat ly encourage Il to go the tho small I Is run cc and it all result rca alt In iii tho Iho t h o cultivation cult ullo I vo tion of thousands of acres aree a le of land which Is 15 now not lying hll Idle IdlE V v V chairman of oC the tita hoard board hoad of of ot this county count Corn Com Commissioner om missioner W V 11 U Wilson VIlson of o IC Weber coun Cohn county ty n and nd J 1 P 1 Tolton of ot Denver county In to favor of 01 b the Ihl ac uc a linn of or tim Hio land haunt 1111 boat board after ater listening 1 to 10 the explanation of the members of or the Ito hoard Mr 1 1 on of Weber lieI county made a motion ii that thuri t the e action 1101 ct lou of tho board In iii fixing the price Irice at nt O per acre be ho WINNS WINN MOTION In Ilm T 1 I Win I of n county 1111 oppose op ost the thc motol and ld offered an UI 11 amendment to the effect that the tie board butil of o laud land lall coin COlI he Ito rc ne lell to t lor thu tho price of land to 1150 SUO per rr acre as 15 the theIn minimum In I n in price Chairman I mao it ruled Ii I Wl r motion mol on out nul of o order whereupon a 11 I motion laotIan to 10 adjourn was WIH made Ilde unit and lost lost Mr Ir motion was 1115 11 th 1 curried by b h a ii 1 vote of tt 30 O to In 12 I A t curly copy of or It the tIto tlc motion motol wa wal truis ordered to In tobe tolt be lIe lt forwarded to tn the Rou and ull also ulfo the board bun Id The he meeting then Ihen adjourned s |
