| Show 1 i I IL ILi RE CLAUSE IN RAILROAD RATE BILL BILLj j Fulton of Oregon Made Legal Argument on Constitutional t c Questions Involved h JL y i NOT NECESSARY TO VALIDITY I III Would Not Xul Mit F j Di UlI s Shipper II and I JLII OUen Kiino tui April 2 Tho amend tn in the tu iou rate rath bill billI I upon nt at tho th hlll hy by of ut Ir the bill 1111 for fr n im review of ot ur ero of at the va offered In lii Inthe Inthe the today lOlla h by Ul of nt o Him Iun nan 1111 hut but ho hu vim Willi s not lot uhle lUt to 10 RPt get the tile t 4 Hour to 10 mako his bis on ill UK till I ht bill hili bi I I IThe The Jho principal toda was wn 1111 hy by Mr of ut who spoke for tor till the bill hili It Il wu a II lf al ur nr arl u fI upon tim the l l In tiit legis legislation lation and so n 0 UP Lle that thu tho to toI a II debate on Oil law points point whorl the Iho I 4 of ot thu or er divided Mine with vIti a it majority 3 f 1 the lito tin of ui lilt Still I Mr r ut III null and Mr r Heyburn of at Idaho made brief I on all the tho bill hili The Tho principal point Joint lie hp d sired to inako In III II his hI KUld Kald Mi i lU II 1 11 that It MIH not to 10 the 1 f validity of lit the bill hili that Il H a provision for tIl a II 1 i ii Mr Ir 11 said that If It the tho cummin Ilon rate rato was them tiler Willi uI I I no means III en In III I Ii tIe the t bill bitt for fUI the th t l cli I Ito I to relief Mr d that he lie liel not lot give Khe Ills 1118 Iii support rl to tu the hill 1111 l rights were given the Si t shipper and the railroad t Mr wild ead however tit it wa wall wae lt j l I not Hot the tho heult of ut the controversy r and that the shipper no Ito that the tile l t II flu UI lolI I will vi I I ii ha titLes lites above aIm alo e till the t liet I present lUtes fixed by hy tin the railroads T t In a brief colloquy with Mi Mr tr Teller reller It I rrt I wan waD stated by b l Mr u r that ho do lc to limit the tho court review to the constitutional tight of ot tho the carrier carrierI I Mr 11 Heyburn made mil de the thu point that thai In lit Inthe the court review the th light J 1 of uC tho thU shipper to 10 go lU u Into court was WaN nut I I I given Mr dr Ir Nelson followed with nn all au aru argument I ment to Iu show how that the omission of or o a II would not i provision for tUI 1 t i the proposed law 11 be bo unconstitutional HP Hf te replied especially to Ml Knox l i 3 paid that even ell without e author I jl g tJ I f Hy lIy for review there were three meth methods 5 OIN by which nn 1111 appeal from a J decision of ut if the commission may bt he taken Thin I I I authority Is li under II III I I the Judiciary I qS net act of ot 1887 he uld and lIIlI It may also ho le i under II I tile the constitutional I right to 10 take the matter to the tho I S In III Ii rase an III rate rato Is fixed hr In n the thIn tho tile bill Itself Im titi Implies I J II plies III tee such so cit an alt appeal UI I The rho wilts he ill were pos 1 I I of ot no tight light to tu regulate I Ill tel and Mr Ir Nelson argued that CUll Con Coli i I grees not Ilot be to tot t them t There Is a II general ell e 1 statute and an un unI 1 I n open door tour to 10 nil till parties In us the tue Con Coil Constitution I ho he wild and noli declaim that thai so io 14 long o tIC as t that hint I oui was not hot hand this 1 f I act lid would stand the tue I he teNt Flue Tho senate committee l on Oil I today the lilt urgent dell deli I leney clency 1 bill hili with a II number of ot amend amendments I 11 ments The U Is l added to tin tho appropriation for tor delegates to till the In International i I of jt stateN at lit Hlo lilo JanellO lI that tin delegates Hilali be ho bl appointed HO Mil that as ns asfar ii l tar far an nil ni they shall represent the I I I different sections Ice lion of lit It the country i kt I An Au appropriation or of la Is h made Il SF 1 to 10 0 enable the government to 10 participate l t In III the second con conference cong 11 t ference terene e nt lit Tho 1110 Hague and I isI Is g of ot the tho I appropriated to pay lay the expense i delegates to 10 the th for foi the re revision 11 jt vision of ot tho Geneva An appropriation of or Soi OM JO for im till improvements 5 at tho tim 1111 1 III ii station lit at c Honolulu Tor I of o Han Diego county California an Oil appropriation of CO OOOO Is made |
