Show WAS GOOD ENOUGH REASON accused mans mana lawyer asserted hla his clients innocence so what was waa there for jury to do doa the story either shows extreme ignorance on tho the ikirt of n a juror or it shows what a wonderful clinen sume some lawyers on it jury said a former of a southern indiana city A murder was ond it t was wa not long before wo had anil tho the antin who ilia we were suro sure had committed the food hut lie luid had vioney and lie ho retained the liest lawyers thi the two law we wilt will cull white and kleck because white ahl to and nrc are not no thelle their real ml cs the jury was nindo ninde tit 1111 largely of men who tilled tile ho boll abey were of the honest sort white find black especially while so HO presented be n ted their clients telling ito how tic he could not to do such n horrible devil deed using their heir handkerchiefs occasionally in the that lint the jurors were ear cur aled away anil voted for acquittal anter I 1 met inet one of at the lie jurors mid 1 I to to him jones joner why did you vote to acquit the prisoner tho the evidence showed cl curly clearly that liu lie wom guilty no sir air that annit wits not guilty gad jones aliat makes you think M I 1 countered aliv because air white sold lie ho concluded jones |