| Show I ROGERS READY TO ANSWER n K ATTY QUESTIONS M II ii M N w York Vork March 23 Herbert f nullify of o Missouri f lJ t Jis united In Ni Now w York city Cl last night i tc I prepared to follow Up his Imi Victory I Ithe II It g k I time the Ih Missouri courts 4 I H it II I I HOKer who denied the tIme right ot Ir If Mr Ir Hodley 10 lo to force tl e him to lo In iii II the lime stilt milt of or tIme state of ot Missouri i I against the Standard Oil Oh 01 anti and allied 1 1 companies at nt tins hearing here hete last Jn c month until such uch time llama us U u a I decision dI lol t ti i In irm Ml l affecting time the am l li line lne i i n e of IC I uy Imd been announced Ij y shilL ml word worl yesterday to 10 Henry henrI ik Now No York representative of ot time the SUIL Stil t ot IC Missouri that ho he would Interpose I fm I Irio no rio IU further objection to answering Mr 11 l Interrogations mJ it i Halley IN is accompanied by 1 Ruth hush C C tt U Jake assistant Thu rho Hl hearing was set Het tot for or today tolar but bul by con CO CObeli bent beli will wi not mint bv be before to tomorrow 1 morrow orrow Tho Thu object of tnt r Mr Mt II Hadley l I Itu Is Halle m to tu time the Ile Standard OH Oil 01 officials to Itt ll W li admit control of at tho tIle ji I Oil 01 company cOllan I i b r Ho Belll I ug asked if it ho ins t m ou O to hU his Inquiry upon the pan part g ut of Mr I Hadley Harle said Time The attorneys for tor hits Iho Ih n I the tIme statement tn Iii h J 3 Ilde s rs Jl ii court that If I the tha or 11 ci i h UK tIle 1 court was 1 adverse t I i 1 their thell contention against R testifying ai as aito a ato i to the hue the stock ownership of ot the Imre td ii companion they would no nl longer laniel r 11 cc I to answer 1 I have hwo no ito reason relon t tm lt 1 di that but they this the will still 1 adhere to their iii on aim point I Mr 11 71 ad ley saM sail that subpoenas lin hA html 1 i boon been Upon H It I H II II I M I I II Id W ltV I P n W Wid d Hampton and amid ld John J D P Archbold I ii t 1 aid that no mm service had beets been it el I i f fined cured on John D 0 Rockefeller 1 i Mr Mt Had leys attention being called s J 4 to the ht fact of It if the tho th arrival of or g A a hOI hov Q L v i baby hahN at nt tIme th home of or John D P Jook bt foller feller Jr 1111 mint the reported r disposition of o John J D Rockefeller Sr to vl tl t 11 JC lI city d to lo see seo his new grandson ho lie sail 1 If rc I John O n wet wem weIl to M so 1 f ii p that ho Imo h desired to visit the lime th homo home hl hi his von son to In pay lih hl respects r to time the new i iH baby tishy and au to ailt Ml Immunity from fr the process carvers roner for tor that purpose r I 1 t be to consider I n ly by I time DIP r of oC waiving mv my i iI I 1 know of ot tho tIm 4 I t that are aro prominent at nuch loh H R time and amid i l believe I would bo be be to 10 I m tile the immunity In question 1 Ij |
