Show THE LATHAM CASE Suit Sull Sn I t I by h I D J 1 i l i nii a us Decided Hj I li Judge huh Moren o has 1100 hal rendered a decision In lu ho ease rn e of ot D I 1 Evans Eval against the Mining A Smelling In which he ho finds In Ill favor of lt neither party and lill all each cacti Is or ordered orlend lend dered dere to imy rny II Its lii 13 own costs co t Ev Es Evan B BInl an sued to recover cover r 2300 harrl of ot Muck In the company find also 27 1 nl ni Ip to 11 be Ie I due 1110 on n U contract for or 11 lug Tile The company tiled flIed a I cross ro In which It Il ticked judgment for tor 17 alleged to be he duo eltin tot for tOI non mon money nonI ey CS I advanced Ir to plaintiff pl The court found folio In 1 II favor of or defendant on tin the th and In II favor of lit If plaintiff on rn tile the hence neither slie 1111 a Il 1 judgment Ju and ami each must pay la In Its 11 own touts lo tl |