| Show ARGUMENTS I IN PACKER G CASES S ES Moody Appears in Per Person Person Person son a Very Unusual Thing WANTS THE GUILTY PUNISHED After ter tho ho mig semi t I Men I tji II and II Not flor rt r Ille II mc Inanimate I ii I ChIcago March Wil Wit William William liam llama H Ii I Moody commenced the clos cbs closing tag ing arguments for Cor tho the government to 10 today day Ouy In tho the heatIng hearing of oC time tho Immunity pleas liens advanced hy by the tIme packers Tho TIme courtroom was packed to the time doors doo with local beat attorneys 11 anxIous to hear henr the argument nt of ot the tt In opening all his hll argument nt he ie declared that the tho eyes of oC time tile whole people of or orthe time the United States Plates were weN directed to time tho courtroom In iii which time the present hear hearing ing Is III being held h ld anti and un averted that the tho government of thu United State Is fur Cur or too much In III earnest t In lii tIme the pres present ent case to pursuit lurU as the attorneys for tor tin tm th packers have Intimated It In lit pursuing a n senseless penile leu mention of ot thu law Irm II 11 He lie that If It wrong tied hud been een committed lell the time Ahl sinking time the punishment not of ot a n cor corporation I era I ion hut ho t of ot mm f the thu II i tig hm mig beings who committed tint time th Wrong The Tho government timid mid people of nt till thin StateN he ime 1 will wIlt willbe willbe be tI with nothing ices than that Ho Ito that his hili appearance nt met time tho bar of 01 the tile court sa II II I unprecedented limit hilt the lime luv ia gave KoO him the right to appear not much delIberation he Ice believed It to be lID his hlA duty deity to appear The Thee justi for tOl Or lets hi action he ho said MIll would be ho found not tint only In the Importance of ot the present can calm limit hut In the tact fact that If IC immunity he his t upon the time defendants on the tho ground roun upon nicole which It linn hens been heen It would loul 1 overthrow time the legal lesi Ie 1 of ot the government f tr fr r 1 50 20 o yein Ir IrlIn and lIn would especially cripple the gov gor Ol In Iii Its 1111 10 to enforce the laws lawN of ot the Mr Ir raid In Iii I 1 speak un ore under der a ml 1 deep d ell sense of ot reeling because of or the these e pro prosecutIons nil nfl over ocr thee tho country Not Nol tong long n a o a 1 certain In New Cl York data concerning the of oC re rc In lii time the sugar u ar relining refining business hu t 4 Out Ont of this charges es leave have in own t the nod oth others othera ers eric They arc now no by a 1 grand Jury Jun and PO so I 1 am not at It lib 1111 liberty erty crt to tn say HI whether they the are Iff true trul nr or not lint s It U l Is charged I nr to 10 of nC thousand of w l r h to the time railroads ant and got n a club chub with emit t they th y the of this country Into submission so o that the tIme mi r trust Inn tallio taiko their prop property property erty erl It If the tIme contentions In this ens coe are true trill these thes railroads tire are then Im Immune mune These seem e pm to hay havo havon hayft n ft averion lon to Ii the time of oC my amy or un testimony of oC their Ih lr guilt They rhey plead they ore tiro not v V in MII lr to the lime Indictment Timey do In not soy fay n therm lent hut the 11 are e not but ticey do say a utility guilty or not net ech of ot thorn then lies has received a r pardon It II IH lit the Ulm of or each earh ono one or of these t he separately that h m Is li to 10 hilI a n pardon une upun Ulon mm Ie ea a u one Ie of or them rP r rests tA i the burden of or proof They Time rhe cannot dump clump nit nil of ot the evidene and nil li or of f their names Into Inlo a n has bin ba hot ket and amid then claim Immunity for COI every cry everyone one After fter reciting tIme thi furls In the filing of oC lh tit timo plea ideas of ot Immunity and nod declaring ing Ir that hat t they are ure plainly an no after on the part of or the time defendants the time attorney general continued one oils on of oC these e defendants must how hn that lie Ie wn was ni compelled to gl gin evidence HImo himself with white regard to t the till n n charged against t him In Ite Inthis InthIs this lids Indictment It Is I my 11 understand understanding tug ing that the privilege or of the time a nil lid tho timo Immunity of ot the limO witness s 1 I Is to himself fIC HP lime In is protected protect Hum producing nn aim evidence or 01 e eIng gl gI Ing ten nn which might iii 11 I II I mat not e him He 11 I I e can elm told take e ii i ige of lIt time tile lingo of ot UI In other oilier pr wr pryon yon son whether that ba be 10 nn aim or 01 u mm ieee It I I I In Is If not a 11 HK Ue i tied lIun i on of or o properly time the rl deuce muy IllS be It If It i h Is I evidence ii ml l of books or If I heave p In Iii my lily III n a 1 book Ing MI tell lItt by ii h my lUy m Initials hI li me time all 1111 tho th Lb ic of ot the i 1111 U II i huh my lay poi pOl i b because e It U Is t my m per leer perl F tl em l I rI Ii t ii Jet the tle I m a Contti tim lion nm Ill Imi t I bo ho l o compelled I to gl ive evidence myself Alt All tty Miller r representing Co 0 a 8 They mull you IU to glie gRe it up III they Ih It If they tho thie did iId not pu lu luOU jou OU omm under tinder ith 7 Of or they I h he c reI Atty tty U ne len n Moody l because beenu I i Rive Ii I te It I I up mu m I lii 1 c a ii t a 1 i Lu L al or an nn Immunity If Ir I 1 hue huc got Rot It I hll l un on t tu tic It until unLIt I ant meni brought by M of ot law mw Into court tumid 1 I 1 then I 1 rely roly rol in IJA I 1 have ha a right to rely rei upon tho protection of or the Ihl If It Mr Ir Armour or one illIC ot Of these Ih e ants lints Was to 10 appear before the rand grand Jury nn 1 pr luce these thc e books of Cr theirs i time lie nosier they tile ought to Is U that tile vere not lIot In 10 theIr pomes 11 es lon len If It time the books In hick thet i or r If it they Produced thim they could 1 not hot o Immunity the hooks books 4 I brought hr t In ice contained I ned neda r a mt do In lug C to 10 t 0 lomo ii offense lI c of or tho tb person Ier oll who wh brought In the honks bonk waR wa guilty The rime rh then wont ont on onto onto to In claim that beet t the pleas In Immunity had hart not o of or the nb mb H of or the tho of un an compulsory i of the law hate lie p n nho sail ho hn regarded this Ihl absence ah ns nM decisive of the time ro case cape ns tea n mm matter of ot jaw hi w wAtt Atty Att en Moody Mood loo l will probably speak peak nil of tomorrow are to ao frighten him Into trite disclosing tho the locution location of ot the thu mine millo Scott Scull says that when the lime ambush oc cc occurred currell he ames conducting Dr Johnson and anti party to mining property In III Inyo nyo county belonging to 10 I eps who selmo WI hot Ilot a member of oC the party nor In tint th purt part of the time country at nil all Ho tic declares that Dr Johnson Ins his no nil part port of ot tho the swearing out of oC tho th war warrant UP rant against him timid that he and John Johnson Johnson son are personal friends Scott d that ho lID has no Intention of ot running away tulLe quite the contrary he ime Intends to go to San Sate FrancIsco next week or orIf orIf If It that Is 18 not enough ho he will waive ex cx extradition X tradition or h At nt any nn time cash cacti cn h bull ball to ta the amount of or |
