| Show STAI JOHo FILES ITS NSW ah urges upholding of decision of th court of appeals reversing judgment 1 against company lawyers for Colo colossal tsal corporation do ing everything in their power to prevent collection of fine of imposed by landis chicago counsel for the tha Stan standard dari oil company of indiana in tin an ansei filed on to the petition 1 ff I the government attorneys attorney atto ineys iney for a to la hearing hearl ni of the appeal from judge I 1 andis judgment fining tho the pom coni I 1 any 2 29 19 2 10 for the violation ol of tho and anti rebate laws uphold tile the de cislon of judges grosscup baker baher ani seaman of the united states circuit court of appeals reversing the judg went merit and lifting the th e burden of the fine as good li ifft amply justified by the records of the case rn in tile the petition for re heating aho reviewing judges are charged bittl assuming tint that judge landis attempt ed to try and the standard Stindt rrt oil company of new jersey in the lh original proceedings chich wait no against tle tie standard oil company oi 01 indiana on this point the answer esclares ee eel clares ares it to be a matter of no con sequence quence pe whether the dial cobit re berred to the new jersey compa company riv or the indiana compan as not a virgin offender 11 the real joint Is saas the answer did the trial court in imposing punishment take into consideration the relations between the stand ml tid oil of indiana and did it lase lap tta its nna fine upon tri tr i wealth of the standard oil 01 company of new jersey jer ey end its ability to pay hift eal of 0 upon the ahe wealth of the standard oil corn com grigni of indiana find and its ability to pay to determine this question tile he standard oil company a at attorn tornes evs at as pert fort that a few sentences extracted by the government counsel front from the orda nords of landis aie not but I 1 dent clent and quote at length from jude judae lindly on fillon to show that lie referred to the nev tersea cor Torn T oration tion as the real and to ohp he indiana company is as the nom insl inal defendant the conlu con slon stated bv the tin nn per fer Is 13 thit th it the fine in flirted upon the pendant d was le iv cause of the ownership of its stock yv the standard oil company of N cn jersey ond and of the financial of the litter corporation Is I 1 dl dispute v h hn pil the entera anin ian of the trial cobit 19 I 1 considered |
