Show ARTHUR B BROWN OW ARGUES M TI I In iii Notorious tery Case Puts VI hip a Talk To 0 Quash WITNESSES NOT I I I A f ris 1 I lint hat Ma III Inc have First I Wit Vit hess uess Prior to 1 arguments on tho lie motion to quash tIle tho II in the tho case caso of oC lie tho state vs I Arthur Brown with adultery were heard before Judge MorlO Morse ti this II In the tito dl Vision ot of the tho district court J Brown closed hil liis I by Ild and rending toni 1 it number of oC authorities to show the defects complained ot of in III this case coso are oro fatal to tolie lie thu The ho upon uon which he asks hunt Ito ho be are aro butt the tho I In nor 1101 any aty oIlier othel WHO were not hr bY the I the nf aH issued us UR to thI their knowledge of oC time the crime ed of oC Il or IS as to whether or not any ut of Cense and that wal was hot sworn to time tho as by Il lats but was sworn to before 1 a deputy clerk ortho city court A ar arguing guing the lie lution In of the ho state a situs IS token taken until 2 Mr Ir e tha that under section of oC the tel tho ho nl ai of oC time tho county attorney to the hue once atico of oC the tho tutu Is 1411 iii C vi tho t lie tuition of oC lie by time the Irate other oIlier ot of he are and should hut been brought tip lit at this time line hut butt should len been mado hI he tore fore District Attorney wil will Col Collo oh lo low this oli and conclude the cur ar arI for or the tho s state otc |