| Show CA CANVASS VASS SHOWS SOME CHA CHANGES Official Inspection Reveals aNum a aber ber of In the lie First Precinct I DOES 1101 ALTER THE RESULT I Wor Vork on the ht lica Interesting Are Arc Looked liar lor liarI I The Tho ot of tim tho ot tho municIpal election which wn wa begun In last last night by the tho ell city council shows I number ot of In tho Irm the tho First precinct of at Which the tho to 10 or Of the tho ol hut but Iho I ho In i at tin Just 31 VOles 30 In till Iho FItii and ono OM In thu Iho Eighth lost 20 votes olos In the he wall wa with 17 I votes VOleR on oh dec ello Uon tion night when whon It Inso 1110 beca only 15 10 votes lit hI the Iho and C II I Felt lost 10 1 In the 1 dIstrict Isaac Socialist candi late for lor mayor lost 7 In tho S Ii SIn In lie Iho Nb lb 4 In the Iho Eleventh I a total loss or of H 11 votes volos In lie Iho precinct J J Mo els CIS lost loat 20 VoteS In lie tho low lost 1 In the tho Eighth Nye Nyc lo lost t 1 Ia I Ill dIstrIct hilt but gained 1 III tho th Mrs lost 1 In lie tho I Fourth lost 2 In III Iho ho Ninth SocIalist lest 2 In I the tho l Fourth hen the council was IM to 10 PresIdent Cottrell II led Sharp nud A J Davis us 1111 tellers There ve only a very 01 row few IH WatchIng the canvass them were ChaIrman Leaty ot of the ell city commIttee W SV II H Bramel CIty Cily Alt Atty Nyc CouncIlman elect I 14 IJ D Martin II HI Water lonor 1 0 VO 10 I others lu iii till ull but bul two or of the hero was Willi a discrepancy the at o names ou en the official poll book nud nUt the Iho number Oil lii official register These h vere merely due to 10 the neglIgence or of lie lii III on the register II s ho had voted In dIstrIct No 1 the tho con 40 while there were ero only Oj on the Iho regIster was a dIscrepancy or of seven In the dIstrIct tho ho showIng Sit names and the tho number on tIm register lall ns In III the ThIrd ills the Iho Jud oll felled to 10 check 2 22 per perI PerSOns I SOns Vho had o ted rii con whIle only were checked on the Iho There wall seas ono one In the tho distrIct which was sus k FOURTH NO CO The Tho returns In the tho fourth dIstrict wore not lint complete as the vas ml mIssing lIllI auth one of oC the Iho J 1 J Whit lil I fOiled to slim sign the tho I A messenger WOR sent for tor the rc I anti ond to secure 1 Me 11 tore to 10 the tho There Thoro were no other In tie It thi th flail fet ala the FIrth Were names on the tho pull hook ed on the tho In this Martin host 30 votes The In the tho SIxth dIstrict ai I and worl Vere C n Ii Iho lie Thelo we ern 1 challenges In thIn three ut ot which NO one nol ono one sorl In EIGhT were eIght In the tho nth dIstrIct three Ihno or of which wort ere and live IIvo sorn In ilio Poll 1011 hook shoved cast but hUI only checked 01 Oil the lie register In the dIstrIct hero thoro vero MO names 01 on Ihl he 03 checked on tho ho register The all register 11 In both ninth nil tenth dIstricts tallied there beIng vote ote cast In III Iho ho former OtH In the Iho hatter in the tho eleventh contained whIle 4 there 1010 ere onlY on Iho ho re reg hays lost 20 O votes In III this ICONI lm TonIght nl itt 7 the will on Iho Ito from flom Iho lie Bc Second It 11 Is expected hint much loon Interest will vIIi bo taken In the Iho eon enn uM In thIs distrIct as this be In tho ho vote for tor for lor the Ihl short hort term torm which elect lie two nur bidge anti I thus change Iho ho or o Iho ho new lIew councIl men awn were lIy by PluralItIes of only sIx elx and tOil ten volos respectIvely anil tin III om nih I chil canvass mIght In those eases caMS alter ollor I the tho results materially Y I |
