| Show DISBARMENT M T TP P PROCEEDINGS COI nos Against Attorneys Snow Bow Jan HC heard Today ARE TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT Defendants Presented lii In theIr Own Mar aim 01 the The fhe disbarment Attorney I Snow J M now how howman man and W U II Wilkins this morning Ii h time tho court COUlt nit all ot of time tho Justices being except Jus was 1111 front from sitting In III the tho Judge sat Fat on the bench hench In III the ot of At the con cart conclusion elusion of time tho hearing the takemi hy by time tho court Time three attorneys In III their Own behalf and u a committee from flom the tho state bar association Ing of Attorneys J 1 E F I I Fl M MAllison I Allison und and C L C was WILs pros ent In behalf or of that rho three d attorneys werl cited to show o why they should not be because ot of certain son sen made by them In their lu in Jf of itt In Inthe time the case ut of e D Morrl Morrison n vs S Alviras J nod the Morrl Morrison on Mining et nl at against Justice h hot ot of the supreme court The he notion brought to 10 recover shares ot of tock ot of the Mining company which It was alleged Snow had obtained from orrl on hy by ren reason on of false omit In hl his answer flied by J his attorneys and Snow hint Justice ha had with mind used imis 1 ad id at In to I him hi mu to bring time action orni that Ito ho would receive of the tho stock re me from flom It wn also that Justice who smite nII of the Morrison company compAn In William II Child to locate for him bun or of the belonging to time the In the tho lower court n a decree WIS ren rell rendered dered In aSor of and thu tho III id Justice were embroil stricken from the tho record ns its being helnn g 01 to bus Upon appeal to the court the of time tho lower court was tini It citation issued for time tho lit at to cause whY they should not bo be because ot of their charges against JU Justice At the tho today each ench or of time the mat lit torne ft presented an In lo do louse lit of his action They set lIt out that time the made In III time the or of were ero believed by them to be per to the tho issues In the tho case such auch that it If proven would base affect affected ed cd the or of clio client lit They fur timer Pet d out that the acted without malice or itt III timO tho and hind Ito intention of the character lit It ci 01 UlI uny other othel of time the court Jut but they u are Iro merely 11 by a 0 or of to their client that more BPI ape cilia he tiled against t them III thIs coca HO that the they mIght ho be given mul 1111 to answer the charges matly AtI Att Allison amid I merO or of the tho opinion that there thero Is III not cause appearing lit III the roe reo oril ot of time the ease cuso to 10 the court In either or suspending the attorneys rimey ar argued lIed that no Intent or malice was wall shown to attack the character of Justice or any member ot of the tho court Thoy also aho am gued that It if the tho court desired to take any action netlon In time the matter specifIc charges should have been made by against the and timey be given an 1111 opportunity to meet them |
