| Show Tho rho feel sore over Oer the boundary settlement nn anil 1 one orno ot of them suggest that tim tho bi govern mont ment n n a pell pene o for tor the tho cont line IIno that Wa do 10 or It Iani hc II a sort or of bonroe doctrine covering that COUll country try bo be promulgated b by Great heat the Iho United tind thu havO territory hoth on the Iho east nod west or of That III have hicen niada from no ithier than II a t to Oral anI tho United in III on nn 1110 controversy on I It Is ha that the tho two powers would t oUid clash about the Iho tight light to cover with it I Monroe doctrIne fIul It 18 I time line enough to lint questIon when Is fur or attic It Is not lot known flint l ha will lag to of that po Our frIends ought to study tho ho review reVlow ot of tho ho case cuso by Lord ChIef f who said In part lii III III my opinion It iii 18 point Oct ell out on or of the tho United flint the tho coast Is nn term Is i as 18 far ow n I know no recognized 1 rule ruin or It hw whIch would by give II a reo rec to Iho oal I nil to 10 such 1 Inu nod l waters train from the tho const coast fter a 11 InO most t I ala unable to find any in III the no ne connected el with the tho treaty ut at 1825 which the view ireat tahi or Indirectly fOrward n a to the Ithon or III at the head hend Of nr lilletH t I have cit It lilY my duty to 10 Which heil too 1110 to the tho to 10 J I have come thAt the thO answer ot of tue tho fifth question ho In Iii the tho b o I nm am constrained to a 11 view contrary to that pro heated In ot or on behalf of strong nB ai the they are IP In or of It II just 1101 equitable or of the treaty elo tb 1101 In lii III tn n one to put lut II a different construction the lie treaty The case Waa on Its and evidence decided It lIot nor policy At this tuna limo the tho story of another or III IR It recalled which hitch I It against tutu country but hUl which WaH too Itina Illon or of chagrIn although titi 1111 evident outrage ins In the tho matter ot of appointing tho The Tho i ot of certain fishing urges In Canadian waters and andon andoff I on off our Great i i oil ell that Its ConcessIon In the tho matter I 1110 greater tItan or of this the Anion nn naked that thu States pay n a nina of at money to orret the hose o moot thi th rho treaty that the tho subject ho bo left lett to 10 the arbitration of commIssion I era ono one to 10 lie ho b by each gov ov and the tho third to be selected by the tho and hilton the tho third should tint be selected Within three months titter the tho treaty weilt effect thu tho choice chalco Willi to ho hc loCI heft to the Au Austin to the tho court iH H the tho third the h Proposed 1 lit Del minister to the tho United Ito Ho was rejected by the tho irua S on in the ground that hili Interests teru too closely with tiso ot of meat Oreal Furthermore ho flo generally ln In at 1111 personally competent t tor or illiCit lIuch nn an lint Jut the lie ambassador regardless ot of Ito Iho courtesy titto this country tinted Delfosse lie nod the ollor found agaInst the Iho Unit oil cd tho AmerIcan Ills was tas ull titi Judged In duty Found to Ilay tu to Great Orent I million dollars dollar In gold It was saId hiatt tol told his friends lie ho had voted for Groat because It vie y turn to will ln That taa 1119 clearly nn an oat rage Blit Bitt tho ho money Wn Pahi lIe be elitist tho Iho honor the tho hUll hits liD no for tal bitter biller feel teel tugs against thIn country ho toil hut but 11 ha with ucla acts |
