Show about J. J our lour master plan The Tho q question of whether or not to Continuo Continue tho G Moab City master plan project is now Under debate throughout the area Recently the County Planning hoard board ard proposed halting the work and undertaking undertaking undertaking under under- taking the remainder of the planning project them- them s They the were voted voled limited funds by the Grand County Commission to begin their work Vork Dr Ff Tied Fred d Beyeler candidate for the 4 year com com- mission seat se-at oppOses opposes the Issue He stated the county planning la board had lad accomplished more in the past month of of actual practical i planning Jannin than the planning company Chairman Charles Brechtel has appointed c committees he said and drawn an accurate map which c continues to th the c county Jin line Jine T The e present map doesn't include aU the planning area Dr Beyeler said t He X ay t the e planning board has set a anoble noble goal and andare andare are c pa lel They have engineers and a staff staf who are capable they they are are arc local people and are the ones who WIIO have 1 with it tC Contrary to comments Dr Beyeler said I am amnot 10 pat not op ops op's opposed s to zoning or planning My objection is the price w are are paying I 1 think the planning board can cando cando cando do anY job with a minimum of cash outlay and a maximum output of hard labor The second portion of the Ken R. R White Co Cp master pl plan n y ost st The city's portion of this am- am ot the county would pay and the b bAl l ce amount would be covered by r fede federal h rf Dr Beyeler Ier stated lie he is not in favor of g government v subsidy of local projects 11 Mayor VInford Y Bunce Bunco said s a m meeting to study the phase two of the master plan would be called prior to making a decision on its continuance He said recent ent study of ot the city water supply it had b been en called to his to-his his attention that an acceptable master tun ii I J st be available to acquire federal assistance on prof projects gets r Areas M without such su h master plan cannot i U for fora fOfa a federal td ht was was Yas to told 7 n r Ii Ralph Millers Miller Miller Sr nan of the the Grand County Ct C Commission stated d this week he po was very impressed with the e economic study presented by the University oft Utah h at the meeting in Moab last Friday He lIe said many many things gs wp would ld have to be considered be before ore make mak- mak g e a d decision ciston to cl continue the master planning effort lt depend ep nd on city reaction for one th thing ng he said t city and county are cooperating in a j joint int e effort f rt on th the project He said he felt too that as a Commis Bl signer eloner ne he would like to listen to the vi viewpoints of the c county planning commission and analyze the situation Before rendering a n decision Charles Brechtel chairman of the Grand County rl Planning nl Board which recently recommended no fur fur- ih itier r participation in th the s second cond phase of the Ken R. R White Whit Company master plan effort indicated this week the county CO planning board could possibly withdraw the acl action o 1 H He Ha said Bald they would study the situation si at 15 16 meeting tat at which time we will make a Decision i ion whether ether or not to change our to the tho county commission as previously made pan Dan Holyoak incumbent commissioner and a candidate can can- for election re-election in the forthcoming election e ead fd he he he- was not entirely opposed to the tho second phase in master st plan issue at this time He too wants time to tudy the study he situation more mono thoroughly before rendering an an official i decision f It Itis isto to be hoped that the interest created the past few v weeks ek s regarding this problem will result in a good goodmaster plan master mast master some of-some sort for tor Spanish Valley It is also alsoto alsoto to jo be hyped that residents of Moab Valley in general conti continue e their interest t until this problem is solved |