| Show M MAURICE GIVEN 1 f 1 THE LIMITI Gui Guilty of Ins has Opton Option of oo or as Mail Ian D Days s st sHE t HE ELECTED TO PAY THE FluE Ia GullY or of to toI I Jurors Is ht Up 11 this thin nd ad 11 iii or of curt court h by Julg Judge for fOl his hi In lag Ing ot of the tho Jurors In n it il In lie he waS ni anti i tu iI VI I Item Homo 0 I it In 10 tho Ilse which was toot 11 in waR hy by the to it 11 tine ni of nt OO or I a term or of 1 lit In th the jol jail In ot of such boo Jho ot of hoe tho ot of teIts lit In the Iel eyes ot of tim Iho court Is IK cry ory Crol from the lie tact that the Iho sentence o i itt is hot tho max I ittu too I ty which call Iw 10 1 tor oi stick nn ion offense e eMI MI Mr vili 1 lB PaY the tho Ino lIne tiloi lt hon the aN called up UI tIm tho cleric red read tho lie or of Jurors Mo 10 anti Knight lug the tho n against which bitts heretofore II lii thell these col columns r Mr AIr 1 as then thon Clell called to the wit tit neu Int and examined hy by Attorney George I b NyI Nyc ho appeared ito In his hla hohult le lie ho he stas only lt ut Cite Iho trial lot the case of at Jane Vs s this the Frost frust of th lie estate ot of H 5 DavIdson deceased In which ease enso this mner mactier arose tot tor n it vcr er few tew Oi oil tw the morn morning hII ut of Oct 16 15 was there again about 4 In the of nt unit II In behalf of de be lie He then lP up State Stalo street Jurors hamilton Ind and InIght Ind and toll told that he hit boon York work lug 01 on the hook books ot of Mr Ir 1111 anti that if H ni all the acts brought ont colt there would he be to plaintiffs coln IT That evenIng he n a arose at hil itt home In regard to the testimony ot of Mrs Jones who WIS ovus n is wItness In Inthe th the case ottO nd ho tec 11 to 10 call al lt 11 Mr Ind and had out about the Iho testimony 11 Ito admitted the tho cl erS ton 0 as let net forth In Mr l but bUl that lint he turned when the house toM told Mr r ho had Hee either lher jurors about the case lie He said t fUrther that he hc hit 10 no Intel tOI toil to 10 tt the tite jurors verdict lct did nt not to state whirls whIch ld not appear In evidence the Iho lt Itt trial Mr Ir WIH was then called to the tho he Court Ito he load had to say IHlY th n that the et out the toots AU Att Nyc Nc then In an appeal for tor on behalf or of the witness lie that the tue witness WIS Was guit guilty or of yet ret It WIH vas certainly not hil Itis lit to coitt mitt L the ot of tense ant and Ito ho Ild bid nut not knol know that lie he WIS vuis an offense 10 lie said loot Ihal has Itan never served ns as I a juror ion ionIn Is In not nol wih tle the given jump I s h 1 lie tho court concerning conversation with about the cases before hence Ild not klow know ho he an I offense Mr Ir N Nyu o loath had ICy l la 8 Morris F M ti l I N Iotis eul IH as to character anti hag In 11 cOllun All 1 that his In was ovelY every I I Mr N Nyo e then to lit to 10 he be With time the In iii slew ot of hll Itis Rood good In tint the coot 01 t amul tho lie tact fact that h lie lint hall no 0 II iii tent to the tho of off ilSe uni anti In vIe VIew ot of the further fact that the leR o has already heen U it severe evele otto ona to SUMS tP Si JUdge otter stating the mit mat tars lost sel out 11 In the tue or of tim the jul jut urR 01 5 MIl said that none ot of the tho nl at hl heel hy by MI II Sei tel Ild end the tue fact act that he went to tn the tho hOlo home ot of the tho juror and asked to 10 speak to 10 the tho case after having ai a talked wih tH other two y WO tan to the tho court that lii ho intended tO 10 him lit In his 11 et diet II Iii therefore the wit tit nell hoods In 10 le he In of court In Iii said Clint It that the tito young man inca Wil II lit touch Huch 1 a loUt hut tile Iho offense waR tas one not nol against the personalIty of at the court hit but tim tho court itself antI houll too he punish eth I 10 lie then Ihen ell seit on ns as stated above u |
