| Show rill PHU IO In explaining the thu reneo le for tor the Ihl change of oC none ot of the tho Ii 11 1 Y Academy at Iron to the title of at the 1 University wo io Incidentally mett meI tinned that the tho moro more juvenile but excel excellent t lent Institution at Logan Will called the thet t Young college an nail l therefore it wall waa the tho Academy not properly take that Home We are In forted that tome ot of our i elated with the n IL Y College nt at Logan t feel Mart at the nee IlIe ot of the word Ile They want to Inow whether It refers to 10 the character ot of the work at f that or It Ito I RI age ant and Claim that It if the latter r It Is Ic only about tn ten younger than Ih the y At It the former that dust the Col ColI I logo 1010 is 18 quite up U to the mark ot of the tl tUB tue ot of the Academy We are arc porI that an any remark of at curt curtIn In n taken as AI nn at on between the two tinne as nothing 8 further titan that tram front our Intention We e th the ee 01 nt It at Provo RR aa the ot of and 4 theror of t tb U V College ee 1111 4 the tho CllOn r of at thI th t tan 0 that was In alt all flow much younger It it we not to We Ve made no of ct 1 0 the work rIal done nt at the Iho two of nt learning and wo we think our who took ur at our OUI are oro super Wo We ho have supported the II 1 Y at Logan and edl tonally and assure nil all who ore are con with It that we regard it II III as Wu we have Hol said l nl na n moat excellent then We have hlO to he bo very what Wo we soy about nn nay one Olle Institute ot of horning how hare lost tome other will wll In offence do da not nOl he be hypercritical and do not ho Jo found among those n man nn an offender for tor 1 n word wont |
