Show BOUNDARY TROUBLE Continued from front Pays Page al 1 within the boundaries of ot Grand county Mr Snow said ald that while the preliminary survey recently made by the U U. S. S Geodetic and Coast Survey at t. t the request of ot the Utah state engineer with both San Ju Juan n and Grand counties s participating did Indicate that the 38 degree 3 30 minute taU tude tulle line did fall taJI approximately where claimed by San Juan It II would be the contention ol of Grand county that this fact tact did not change ownership of the actual ac ace property The legislature Mr Snow said ald did state the latitude line Une lineas Uneas as descriptive boundary but that thai Township line Une was then also in fn effect considered the boundary and the now disputed area wt's recognized as a part of Grand county This at the time Grand and San Jn Juan counties were separated from Emery county and ever since the area arba has been taxed and otherwise considered a part of Grand county Mr Snow pointed out There Is no logic in moving the boundary line even though new precision survey Instruments might have determined the two lines do not fall upon each other he lie said pointing out that a future future fu fu- fu ture survey because of still Improved improved im proved instruments or methods might again change the location of the latitude line and ald require another boundary change if such is to be permitted Mr Snow also pointed out that ft n certainly must have been the Intention of the legislature at atthe atthe atthe the time the boundary was set that it be located where it has been recognized for all ail these years ears and that the latitude line was for description rather than for actual physical location and that the legislature must have believed the two to be at the same some place The suit was filed in the Fourth rather than the Seventh JudicIal Judicial Judi Judi- cial dal district court since the latter latter latter lat lat- ter comprises both Grand mid arid San Juan counties and law does not permit such cases to b beheld be beheld held In either plaintiff or defendant de de- defendant defendant counties when the two are in dispute te |