Deseret Evening News | 1903-09-24 | Page 4 | Jurisdiction of Courts

OP OI JAke JAk City sept 24 4 1903 1003 D Nesi For tho th ot of IL ii number or of I Interested Iii the matter will you ho hind to state through your cot col the matte mallo In tutu mornings Is correct that lays In Utah flie courts all rill Were devoid 1 of nC com man law jurl jurisdiCtion An early rell rei III II IiI n u MANi The Is IN c Incorrect It is II mal cover Anybody nc with Ith the history of oC Utah Would know hotter better than l to utter lItter or 01 en such lIuch 1 a notion The courts of the Territory co 1110 II law jurisdiction trout from the very In In holding that right hy by virtue lrI o of their judicial the tho OrganIc Act It In terms ferms Section nine nille of oC that act de the judicial POW of at the tho tory tort nn ant vested It In II a court I District courts courte courts and Ju I or the tho It I that of the tho courts court should bo be us as hy by Ian anti fur titer thoro that the raId PRill Supreme ond 1 11 shall pOSSeSS all as welt Well nil flu Cornillon tinY Stole diction those courts were to Oil 1111 intents and I courts wn wan by the tho Court of at the United hut Hilt In the con coit upon them n as court coitUs ot of the Ito ir of Utah they wore vore with poor hotter to sino jurl I In nit nil cases g the tho and ot of the tho United liB as asis is II e lod In the tho nod dl courts of at tim tho they thoy acted In III n it flOat na territorial I I courts In III nil 1111 cases arising under the tho laws of at the tho Territory or of utah anti as 1111 UnIted courts lit III easel capell arising under the tho Con ConstitutIon and ot of the tho UnIted V Titus Thus the tho or of out our no matter who It Is III contrary to seiI fact nOll to 10 the tho term ot Of the tho Organic Act Acl lint is III on en its lace focI whatever he C the motive that Its