| Show MODIFIED BUT Blip Mining Suit Stilt Sui Decided In of ot Anil 4 11 tutU Tho The Supreme court yesterday y after noon no m handed down dowl an un opinion In the lime ease case of ot Frank C l Hutan arid and F Snyder v vs Louis Lids C Huck luck 11 appellant 1 In I which the Ir Judgment of or the lower tower court I Is modified and anU then affirmed Thit Tims action irU brought to secure nn an accounting for or on dividends received by b HUlk Huik k on i ertain slates of a stock In tIme tho Laurie Lauric Mining company Hutan claimed that he h entered Into Inlo an nn agree Insult ment with wih Huck Huc whereby the tho two wo o were to enter Into time the mining to 10 Hutan kutan was IS to furnish his ex ox and labor as an a mining mini ni enl engi fleer neer neI and nn Buck Huck mas as to provide foJe tho the money one with which to develop th the prop tray tra secured nail ami the tho profits from time the were ware to be divided us tin tl follows to 10 Huck arid one ole third to Acting under hunter ludel agreement the th two men cattle Into of ot shares share hal of or the Annie Laurie stock hut bul Huck to pay his hl share and refused refusal to account for tor the daml on the same me meA A decision wan WD n td d In the lower court In lii II favor of ot am and Snyder Sn der who action became Interested In itt II the time trans transaction transaction arton The Supreme court holds boIls that Huck should he be charged with 30 cm 9 nf nt the stock nail 11 with wih the dividends there thorp thereon on anti with wih 60 the proceeds re received re by 19 h him train from the sal Ile sate nf ot 1 1000 O shares chares hn of ot the stock The court further further holds that he ha should be he require to tn de liver to plaintiffs UK 1110 IlG 23 3 shares sharer which ce Is la of ot the te total number 01 ot of 1 held by him upon plaintiffs pay payIng llY PAYlag I Ing lag to 10 him of ot the Indebted nets lIeu contracted In II with wih lh the I T Tie The o defendant I II Is given the option a n number of shares if lf the stock Jo o 0 laY puy off ot the tho Indebted Indebtedness ness lees Iles and then th n deliver delver to 10 plaintiff one on third of at the tha The he opinion of Jf the tho court wa written by Justice JutIe concurred In by Chief Justice Burtch and Ind dissented from by b Justice McCarthy The defendant hunk Hock was aau president of ot time the Annit Laurie un no n to the theline time line ago ugo of ot his death n a I little over u r 1 month I |
