| Show DIVORCE DAY itt IN DISTRICT COURT Matrimonial Troubles and Mis Misalliances MIsalliances alliances Adjusted by Judge Howell OGDEN BOARD OF EDUCATION eHlI and Routine Business s readier Paid rd Unit Half Months d on Old Loan Ogden Oden Dec Dee 23 Judge Huell hud had a 3 al l busy day In the district t court yesterday disposing of ot a II number of ot divorce null that have been pending for tor soma sonio time The divorce suit of ot J G 0 Taylor against Emma Taylor was wan tried his Ills honor The Tho testimony t of ot the plain plaintiff plaintiff plaintiff tiff went vent to how that the thu defendant deserted Ie her husband and without cause atIe The decree ng n s prayed tot toe was V land and the custody of the minor ninor child was given to the plaintiff The divorce suit mutt of Jl Ii against John It U Graham WIH dismissed nt It the tho request of oC the plaintiff a I recon reconciliation dilation having been be n effected Hearing of the divorce suit of at Mury M I r True frue against S 3 True was wall con can continued canI I without date Tho divorce suits of or Alvin Clark against hannah Clark and bod Fannie U B Wilbur against Jm hn Wilbur were both placed on the tho dell dead calendar May Mn Douglass against C 8 a Doug Douglass lass 1168 divorce suit nult brought on the tho of at was as heart anil anila a I decree entered In III accordance with the allegations The divorce suit of at Charles Sherman against Louis K IC Sherman was decided In of the plaintiff the wife having deserted her husband On the grounds of Insertion desertion the bonds of matrimony existing between C A and Clara Clai 1 D were dissolved NO CAUSE OF OK ACTION The damage suit of ot I J eltman against the Ogden Paint Oil Glass to recover 16 alleged to tei tobe be he due for tor personal injuries sustained by hy the plaintiff whose hose horse ran awa last summer ummer while bile he ho was out driving throwing plaintiff out and severely In Injuring Injuring juring him which accident he ho claimed was due to the carelessness of o tim de cia defendant delivery d boy who I frightened horse The rho Jury after atter hearing the evidence brought Ina In Ina a verdict of ot no cause of action Hint has hns been commenced In iii the Sec See Second ond onci district court by the Molina Jewelry company against D L i Doyle to recover The complaint alleges that the de tie defendant on Nov No io 2 1 QI purchased a quantity of at merchandise which was wu de lip d II vel cd to him by hy the plaintiff but hilt hat never ever t been bt n paid for tor and plaintiff de demands mands judgment against t the defend defendants ants ante for tor the sum of ot the Invoice MOD |
