Deseret Evening News | 1905-07-29 | Page 2 | The Minnie Maud Case Affirmed

T THE f MINN M MAUO U CASE In lit an itil written hy by Jm u ulion then lion n ti In hy hI 1 ii 1 ItI tub Ihn stu uuno court P Bt ft f II tho tiit jutt I of tnt 1 Iho Ito lower In lii the lit on HO nf or If Maud Mallil KM mM I tot II VH Vol K t lIl itt hI I I action wan ti brought to 10 o title tithe to a it 1 portion port iou of or tin i ho ii iu I of 01 Innie I Maud creek located In III 1 county Thin Tho in court coil ri nil that I ii ti I ti t it I t ii 0 OV iii r of tit it f one n it I half hilll hit h t of it f n it foot of Ott the tue water Ill r hy hi i of III i lUI lUIl o from l this thin Ihl au tilt Will uni tuba on it hy ity Ii ihu thu company runt Tho ho contend 11 Hint Hie slid I of hint llio lower r worn nt not piot to ii ed hy h Ihn t ii ii ti iii t it iA e Tho Iho ii 0 lit I I ii thit t t I h I V iii i e 0 the Ih hA fuel Cant 1 liny nil neKton thor thai tint tho ml un n nN tInt titer liner nf itt of ot n it 1 ferond foot of or the tim II of itt HUI sith lii III n the dry tIu 11 ea n and It of or n si 1 fool nf of Hie tim In thin Ihl U in U it II tJ II for nimo tutu in than t ti it fl HOY HOYen 10 e o v en flu yeam rN pant IIII N I n ii ii il 1 bent it had bitt to oiti I red an situ ailer o tithe to 10 tilt thu flit iho Judgment J uI t t WAN N It lung I y to Iii runt I itt from froni thin HID Ih opinion of nl HIM tiit III smut and Hint Iho tim Ih Mm tim furt till 1 defendant iii limit had only null iI 1 hut din toil i ui ii N v IC er r f Iho t Ii n p t rui iii ami it ii it henro ii not mutt entitled nut itIl tn to uny nn in fl of or thin IIII normal I Iii How ii nl Ilo I I o ett it ci iii I I it ii t t Rn gUt i p I n i roti and ii nit Hint I hun I Hie Ihl t he rUM cumi utu i iti ti ii tilt I tI ho ito r 1 Ii ci h for a it new ilA It I rin I