| Show STATE OWNERSHIP OF RAILWAYS III I it I it I Meyer MII of IC at 1 Ihu t of or bo ho foro tho Iho l 1 on ni Main llo 10 dealt 11 11 with tho in II KII 1111 wih mid 1111 In II which country 1011 aro 10 owned by Iho novel Ho In II III 10 Ono Uno of Ir of lt III nf ot thu Iho 1111 the to III h or Ihl 1111 thorp I I win tho of ot ohI economical Tho evidence now 10 I PIu III hll corded 1 on Ihl in but Oi 1110 1 in 11 11 Meyer 1111 of IC into 1110 To 10 the Ih or III orItH ItH Of ot Hill Ihn COlli Q thu Ihu to III 11 rate would In III no way III prevent l ho I 10 would n II 1111 In III mila mien and Will m II nf or 1111 lv r 01 In III tho Iho I Ihn Ilin power to 10 II x llo 1111 of lit Hm Ihn rl t of lit Uro 1110 Mock In III Ihn went and nt or Ih of III meatH to 10 tho to II Home prohibit lit hr Tho Iho Imd no for tor but hili III hi llo of Iho In III the 1111 went I I on II i at I In 11 north to 10 Iho M ln h vid 1111 that III cd 11 bv h 1110 could an nt III n II fair lIh rn I it II well ralen had been from en lo 10 80 so per cont and lower rate tho needed till for loCc to In Mr Iho nf ot Ihn Kc I o Dock Iw It Hur rut fit 0 1 of lit Imd hilt but not nol in III pru to 10 1110 ho 11 ralen 1111 ft nH n well 1111 no ex IX pot IK who often could do no moie limit cut lIt and ho In hI Ilin matter I now 11 replied Mr II WD 1111 will bu In Hie Ihl le The committee 11 until 11 1 |