Show Fisticuffs Not Duty of State Road I Claim for Compensation I I in Fight b by Commission to C. C E. E Bailey Fisticuffs are not considered an action In line Une of duty for fOI of the state road commission The above dictum comes cornea Thursday Thursday Thursday Thurs Thurs- day from the office of the state In IndustrIal Industrial Industrial In- In commission In connection with denial of a claim for workman's workmans workmans workman's workmans workman's work work- mans man's compensation filed flied by C Cf C. E. E D Bailey who in 1926 while working for the road commission engaged in a fist fight and suffered injuries s. s I Bailey so runs the tale was a a foreman in Grand county In hiS Ms- employ was one Harry Day of Moab who according to Bailey was engaged In circulating reports about him to which Bailey Balley took tion On a morning In September the two met on a street in Moab Words were exchanged Words not sufficing recourse recourse- was had to blows says Mr Bailey and one of ot the blows landed on Baileys Bailey's eye causing he claimed a permanent Impairment of vision Moreover he says the encounter resulted In ar arrest arrest arrest ar- ar rest of ot the combatants and assessment assessment assessment assess assess- ment of ot a fine of ot 10 each |