Show i COURT lIVES Li 5 VERDICTS for Recovery of Automobile Is isI I I Upheld Judgment Ju Segment of f the Third district urt urt was reversed re by the sU supreme reme nf urt Saturday in the case of ot Tom Tom against the Mutual n fit it Health and Accident assor asso- asso r Won on The lower court found for fol Litigation was t to to cover er on an accident insurance Action tion by Margaret A Ak A. Harrison the Ehe he Third district court to rean reel reer re- re er el an automobile from th the Auto unities company was affirmed lithe the supreme court Saturday l e motor company had appealed un the finding for fol the plaintiff court William Peters was charged with lawfully appropriating approprIating- a touring car r. r ln I nineteen t en head heau of oi c cattle e and mone money converted to his use which which- belonged xit it was alleged allege to WilHam J. J Osborne Th The district court ourt of ot Garfield county c ct t found un f for o Osborne From this ju judgment l' l Peters eters appealed appealed appealed ap pealed T The supreme court af affirmed affirmed af- af firmed the trial court Judgment of the Second district court in the case se of ot l M. M I. I Pe Peterson Peterson Pe- Pe terson a against the Farmers Farmers' Grain and Milling l company company In favor o of oC Pe Peterson erson was reversed by th the supreme supreme supreme su su- su- su preme court and new trial granted J was for damages Judgment nt of the trial court Inthe in inthe inthe the the case of John M. M against William William- ChInn defendant and nd Gottlieb intervene intervene- and respondent respondent appealed from the district court of ot Washington county b by was affirmed by the supreme me court The amount Involved Involved in involved In- In In the litigation is and was in the nature of two prom- prom notes The trial court gave judgment for 1 I |