| Show BIDS BIS r REJECTED Broth St Paving Contract Not fot Claim Caim I At Its II meeting yesterday afternoon lt the board br of ot public works rejected nil all ni U ls e for Cor or the tho paving of ot Routh Bouth Temple elre strett t tut of ot tho the City Street Improve j meet nt company being too and w the others ether being belne regarded ns as too high The itt h former was the tho lowest bidder for tor lJ the th work rk anti ond agreed to complete tho tIm OT Jb ob In iso 1 working days dayn 1 term WI 55 not net altogether agreeable to tIle tha tid iFon I as the construction placed n It by the city r It attorney meant daU nt fit Cor or doing thIa class cines ot of otc work Ihie he bard wi will meet again next FrIday When I It may ay decIde to re Ie for bitI eTere 8 There c ui nt at tho the meeting It I ht AI manager of ot the tho Utah the LIb Halway r company who vho ho board that t th the tho Company coPany hud had do I mple to 10 continue its ls tracks on Oi Street na as It WON deem mi to them t ot at thIn time bOard Anther lal r to como come before this ard for tor i th Wa B tim tha ot of A L 14 ot f tho the hark g thu I claim It 11 be remembered that t time me canin clO before b Coro the tho council counci sense somo but ag Was rejected on tho the ground oud that the tho amount 20 ad d 1100 for tor not called for tor in tho the original contract The ho other othor conten contention tion ton WAS 11 that thiU Mr r hud had taken llon I days longer than therm tho the required rO Finally l after nar tho the matter mattor mater ut t tome lomo l n the tha council allowed the claim chains lust hut the ul auditor fu refuted ret od to to draw drav the tho warrant until Uh matter had bon hoen passed parsed ed upon uon by tho the board beard of ot pub public Ito lic 10 works work This the tho board boo Id did mild day afternoon and Ind the tho th claim therefore wilt will now W bo be paid akl wl |
