| Show B AWS PLAN TO REFORM M DEMOCRACY C Clie He lie is for State Ownership of Hall roads and Government Control of Telegraphs HE FAVORS All NI INCOME TAX TAXI He lie Advocates the lie of federal Judges Ju by L Direct Vote ote of The Lincoln N b July JUI II William J Bryans plan Ilan for fl r tb the of ot it Democracy XI er 1011 w n today todo In I II II I Mr tr J an radical ami amia a n from tom HUM 1111 lint hilt advocate the Iho ot of Judg lor for president on us 1 a good oo begin nine lie Jle declare h for tor or of ot go Ill nl 1 control of fir of ot private mo monopoly the thC tux tax ami the ope tion of ot federal Ju by I tim the jle Mr Bryan ii siy si III In tn mil lit I f fy My lly y selection n uN situ bearer of It ofHie the Hie Democratic pty I 11 In III I IIII 8 anti nd again In III 1900 lOtiO made me Inc the loo Of ot that hat purly and iiI JI IR 1111 I lid not l fa l nt liberty t tO III engraft new doctrines Upon till thu party tr fluid I my ny wit with the of ot th theN thEM M and were embodied om JOllIe In the platform Now that the tho leadership devolves upon another II hll I and I l bear beal r only ulY the r reo roll that each euch mutt must namely nil for my myown myn own n opinion my mily utterance 1 mid my U conduct 1 I frIll free to undertake a n work wor which until now I avoid nome name namely ly Jy th im work vork of ot organism the radical r element In lii tha th Demo Damo Democratic cratic party The money mOlley II Is for or lh th pros pro out In III abeyance The Increased pro Iwo production luction of ot sold gold ha lUu th the straIn upon pon time the dollar anil while bimetallism IH nit nil sound sounI In the ordinary n ImS 1111 It II ever evor woe wig the tho necessity nece for tor It II Is not miot w so up ap lint lImit while the people cannot 18 he brought at It this thin tino to tn con the ie I various VIII OUI of ot the tho money mone they thoy din CUll ci bo be b brought to consider car ter tofu other questions question with wit which the tho Democratic party must Juliet dual laal I hl e heretofore refused to toke Hike u IL I po pool lion upon the tho question of ot government own 1111 ownership of ot railroad railroads tint I 1 hud hilt hudnot riot not until studied the subject second because time the had Hot flot reached primary Importance Recent event II II have convinced mo me the time thins Is III I now hOW ripe rille for tOl tile the pta pre I Ion of tile the question ULet to lion tion consolidation lion talen place until n A few fow men now control tho the thoI 1 I railroad of ot the country And defy dof hath both the tho legislatIve amid executive I 1 power of ot the tuition nation I Invite the Dem Iem Democrats therefore to tn consider I n mt I thin for fez the government ownership owne hll owl op oi 0 cration ot of the railroads railroad r roll II The Tue thou ua us Pally Is 18 for the purchase of ot these by lIy tho the federal govern I This plan 1111 it to me mo H ht more objectionable that than a 5 1 plan which hichi Involves the ownershIp ind operation 1 I of ot theu rodg by the several states To 0 put the railroads In the tile hands hand ot of the tho federal government would bo the an 1111 enormous of o power It would give to te the Iha federal government I I n 1 largely Increased Influence over the Ih j I citizen mont tind the citizen affairs A tta Irs ami I such euch centralization centralisation l lii II not lit at nil all nc necal necea f al ry The slates ran IRn an own and opera to within their border borders Ju t nu me 1 1 effectively an as It can cam be done dont by II the i h federal federI government If It II In III I dons done by h tho the states the objection limed based upon 1 I tho fear of ot Is he ly 1 answered A hoard board composed of ot rep TeI tIeR from the various states could deal deol with Interstate of ot time tho linen linea If lf the federal government lu d the railroads to build there t would be tie u n constant between different se IIII er long thons to ecu secure ure u mm fair of ot the th new building and Ond development but hut when this thin la Is left lell to the thO can cun decide whether they desire to or orto orto orto to buy huy While the In III the nation Is III adverting to 10 the ownership of the Democratic parly Pliny in thu tho ell Ie upon tipon tile the annie theory e the thia cause of ot mu municipal ownership of ot municipal trill trun oh Wo Ve have nio reached a n time when tho Oie department oin om embrace brace n II m n ilK well as na nar ix 1 r mall moult While time the telegraph linen ll do 10 not lint leach an many people AH mimi the do mum and while the abuses I of or private ownership have not hot been HO mm HOopen open OCI notorious there In is mi 1111 reason why wh thle this tuition nation not nol do ito what other nations nAtion II me ale doing In III this 1 The rh fh private monopoly mint be he ix de lIe destroyed The Democratic platform adopted at nt Kansan City It ity declared the tho private monopoly to lo be Ie anti Intolerable The Democratic party lartY Inri hue him In III two campaigns stood for tor an RII income tax The rime plank irma omitted thin this year be tho tue mon men In III control or of the party thought It would jeopardise In I time the lie pant east cm orn am elates This objection have when time the il l II is made to II a particular 01 and to 10 time Ille w men of ot that hut hill It cannot have havo W when till the party Uly BO oCa B forth im 1111 It muni ultimately ilo mb to II appeal to tn the masses |
