Show RESTRAINED S IN TAX MATTER Collection ion of Impost on Sug Su- Su S g Enjoined i Jr Enjoining jOining colle tion of taxes tas this year S J I on the of so called caned intangible intangibleS intangible'S I S assets S ets of the Utah-Idaho Utah Sugar corn eom- m- m pany Judge J. J Louis issued r W tI 1 ar restraining a-restraining order The order will be beI I e effective o e until a Decision is made on the I I t original original case of the Utah Idaho Sugar company to prevent the county from j col-j 01 S taxes on the intangible assets The case was brought to prevent collection collection col- col Ik- Ik lection of the 1918 1916 taxes which amounted to In 1919 wh when n the 1918 1913 case was being beingS w. w f fought in the Third Thir district S S court a a. reS reV restraining restraining re- re V straining order was issued against the they y t county pending the decision The taxes S Ir in 1919 amounted to approximately S DOO The latest restraining order places S the 1920 taxes in the same situation as the ta taxes es The 1920 taxes amount f to approximately t S S The Intangible Intangible assets assets of ot the comp company were assessed in 1918 on a valuation of S fixed by A. A H. H Parsons former formerS bYc nI S county assessor County y Assessor James k E. E refused Lynch to place the on the assessment rolls for 1919 and 1920 S s and the entries entries- were made by the county S j commission sitting as a board of equal- equal The original case which will deter- deter determine I mi mine whether th the the- taxes over the three- three S year period can be collected Is under advisement by Judge Brown Decision will Till be rendered before January 1 when his term a. a as judge of the Third district court ends S The The total amount of the taxes which wilL be lost by the city in III case Judge S Brown JBrown decides the case In favor of the company will be approximately This will be increased several thousand dollars by interest if tb the decision is m made de in favor of the city |