Show I I CANNOT OT COLLECT I Im ON m POKER f DEBTS t t Supreme Court Holds GaIn Gam Gambling Gal 1 I bUng bling Obligations IS are arc Outside Legal 1 Jurisdiction I 1 I l l i S L r GAMBLERS BOLD DOLO UNDERTAKING t Receives Some Sortie Decided cism nt at the Hands of or I IThe The Tile u I I j r l I SOCIETY MUST BE DE PROTECTED I t K I K It 1 Collet Cole Sties Paul In J County Count for 6 5 Alleged t I ITo To be Due Itic 1 1 1 i t Id I It I la Is Indeed a n very vary bold t I Ing for Cor a I i gambler a 1 violator of ot the tha f law and amt to tu seek Reek the Iha ol of a at acourt I 4 I court hint of Justice to enforce his j I founded upon Ills liln own nefarious trans tralis I mints Courts ours ough ought not to to I protect society y front from such KlCh i Individuals nut I tIlt is t I Such Huch Is II this the th doping closing In mi HI mm Ii l r r I opinion handed down by hi h the I court today the lie Judgment of ot u uthe the t hs lower lowel court In hi the tho case cane of 11 It 1 I I t h j I Collet Colel appellant VB va A eulor i j j i The flit Ill action Iclon brought In II county COUII to recover K 65 5 alleged to bo he tt tills due cle for fil or money Iou Ion loaned led nod by h i plaintiff lui I I tf to f I f I defendant was WM tendered rendered In II I favor of oC plaintiff but a I now 1101 trial rust wan IR il 1 j 9 granted by h I the hue lower court upon mo motion 10 If r tion of oC defendant mimI and It sae shown J Hi at 1 the tie second trial that the lie money nought to be u recovered woo was title due elle on UI n ct M u debt abut contracted In II a I game of or poker pol er j The rho lower hotter court then rendered Judg Judgment u i ment In favor of defendant which 7 I Judgment was today by iy tho the 4 t court decision of or the tha Y I I lurl it J I 1 |