Show I A JUST J sti The Tue New Ii York tork I rk Independent those not nut prove ot of the verdict I by ity a 11 jury jur according to tu which n a hue hua who had Imil killed blued k III III his hl Palo paia maUl wan was d not noL guilty It H disapproves the verdict on un the tue ground that It by hy Implication that n nIre wire Miff Ire Is Ie a It kind Ind of lit property morally In 0 Ill II It II not nut legally it chattel hatteI whose whoa husband OW 11 II her In n it conventionally moral seas very 01 mulch much l uch as al In III a n legal I gol edrise he hue night might own n a cow row That Is 15 a n startling argument If Ir the tho ease case CA had been If the thA wife under Injury had killed tim tha ii U nilS a lOni t y or even the t lie hus hils there In Is not lIot n 0 jury In 11 America A in t lira hat I hun L 1 not Pin ye so Iii riot not no I gum Ii I the Iii law till all must be he equal other oIlier wiRe vine hew nw Is not lint law hut hilt caprice The flie principle laid haiti down by ii 11 the In It im I correct however huwer It says n a hU hoc hlll nm no moral right to 10 Interfere with his hJ Ion eon duct luct by lIy other oilier moans means than advice and persuasion until he h commits f a breach of or the tim pence nears and no moral right then thell theno to 10 o interfere by other means than an outsider might employ Their rein ore lire those of ot partners to 0 n n ii con COli tract mot rather lather thun hum of owner mill am chattel find and no more moro than In any other wise ounie loes breach of oe contract hero here give lIo t tho tn iii ho time Injured party n a 1 right to retaliate r by hy fraud deceit or If it this principle applied always It t would bo Ito a Il retraining restraining tc force orce ou Oil Ilmo 11 hue For retaliation the tile execution ot or vengeance by private citizens breed bresil hr 11 while the tho just I and prompt punishment ot of crime after due clue process ot of law nets act nn tin a 11 |