Show Or OF BUDGETS sows SHOWS FIGURES NEARLY ALY SAME IN 1 1920 AND AD ADt tC COMPARISON between city appropriations for or 1921 and the the amount of money expended in the various city departments during 1920 became t possible for the first time today when CIt City Auditor H. H S. S McCann 1 II completed the recapitulation of the budget as adopted by the city several da days s 's ago appropriations for the year amount to Total last year were and the total amount expended was fin tf 1 preparing the b budget budget- of estimated expenditures for 1921 the cIt city held extended budget sessions at which they attempted attempted- to cut r ji to the lowest possible figure The original budget requests re 1 from the valuation on which property in the city was assessed 1920 the same tax l levy y as last year Jear 11 mills would bring a revenue of From this amount a d deduction of would have to be made Ue se of orthe the adverse decision of the Third district court in the Utah Utah-Jda Utah jar r. company case and this would leave the city approximately the estimated budget of expenditures An increase in the assessed is s expected and it int Intended to is spend as little over the budget as I possible and consequently the commissioners have declared that a slight t ze cease se e In the tax rate will be possible is a table showing the budget appropriations for 1921 by br aJI and a comparison with 1920 the columns showing the 1920 the amount expended in 1 1920 20 requests for 1920 and the total budget r Budget Ex ended Total Budget Total for DepartmentS DepartmentS' 1920 Request 1921 1921 ut r. r r rEy 1 finance finance- I r 00 I Attorney I i ense assessor 28 I II agent I Recorder I I S 72 I I r surer rm springs sprin-s 19 9 1 1 safety safety- I Commissioner FJ e 50 I 1083 2 5 9 clinic I court M market Pe ice and prison c j Street lighting G Garbage I 2 74 O ks public property property- C. C Git ty county 4 75 00 02 P und keeper 60 Park Parl department n rea 2 P blie safety bl g. g 1 Q 3 1790 GO 6 GO 5 ets ets public missioner Commissioner 00 35 6 H. H 6 00 00 u. u 0 00 I S irrigation JaL Int on sewer bonds Il Imp p city par por I general general- Miscellaneous exp expo 83 03 29 O 02 64 64 I ift lon Inon on general bonds Bond sinking fund 16 I 1 8 r S er supply waterworks waterworks- M Mayor commissioner waterworks dept E Engineer in on water bonds I Totals 33 |