Show WITH T THE I t VAIl VATICAN C Popes Official Organ Gives Gic Re Rc Review view of the Case Before the M WAS PEREMPTORY Insisted oil on 01 Merry del de Val ul 01 Answering Immediately Yes or l Norto No o to Certain Questions Home Hom Slay May MI J The the tIme or organ nn IJU h an nn reviewing tho limo 10 IC existing en Cardinal Merry d 11 l Vui lint thu 1 CI of o silte III M hI J Krench 1 ambas ambassador 1111 to Ii the Vatican Immediately be he foit fOI the tha recall of o time the litter as 11 tho the in me suit of ot the Ihl papal Impal protest 1111 dent dOlt I visit to Home oro last according to the tho Ito paper Pil I III M hi II visited Cardinal Merry Men del dol Viii and told old him ho lIe hlll been ban Instruct Instructed ed II by uy Foreign Minister e to In nn as to time the of lt it time the tiM I It of ot the this note hole to the Catholic powers au at I In III I a 1 1 I U 1111 mute ot which varied from rom that directed to t the h and to auk es cc 11 If I tin tl phrase o the time re to recall coil call sit the lime Ie nuncio which wan trotH Irom time the Ih note nOlo addressed to t France cIet m Its that Wit sent edit to the tha theother other othur The Time clOth inal said he lie would reply Im Ira If It I the time ors M hI NIs ivere put In its II writing ard urd an pointed out that there thero was waa no time lute timeto Ur to do II Ihl and o lt tIme the cardinal then lieu said that thin ho would give glo an nn answer alser within an In hour or 01 oven eoll within half nn an hour 11 ti 1 however Insisted on un an In reply nd pleaded that tho time car Clr cardinal dinal should answer nn yes or no noTime Tho Time later said ho hi was IS sorry norry Irr that lint he was 01 unable to comply with the tile s demands anti RII M ti 1 then th 1 said uld ha ime would have hWe to draw the tile conclusion chili sion Ilon that Cardinal Merry Mrry del riel Val Vat did not hot the authenticity of o tho time note as atm 11 published Tho Tue cardinal l retorted that hint ho lie had not sold said anything of 0 tho the kind to which M 1 replied Then I shall HIHI tele telegraph telegraph graph DelelliS that hint you de do dIne to answer To 0 this tho the cardinal replied that on 01 the time contrary he me hind had promised a I writ ton 1011 answer within an nn hour M then saying that lust bo lit would write Two hours later inter Car Cardinal Cardinal dinal Merry del Viii not nt receiving word lord communication from flom the tho ambassador sent n II cation to tho tile embassy saying that ho hoal was al nt at M At disposal and pro pre to give hc nn un tin answer al but no reply to this communication was WIS received On Saturday M tl II again visited Vl l l tile the le secretor secretary y of ot state and Informed him that hut the Insistence In upon a u written form torm of o his questions hail had been Interpreted as lS mm a n to elude time the subject and that therefore he had been leen Instructed to leave lea Home HOle on vacation The OS concludes First that Cardinal Merry del nl l not having given nn answer the tIme recall of or the thi th ambassador was ns tot not justified second that the time answer which the car cardinal dinal would have havo given within nn an hour would 5 have hMO been heen exhaustive to and thoroughly satisfactory third that hat tho the request of ot M II to be In Informed Informed formed ns nit 18 to the contents of ot the lie notes Bent to 0 time thu other othor Catholic states wa absolutely contrary to diplomatic usage ulse that them heat thorl was no vole rule which obliged Pd the tha papal government to send senda a n collective note nolo |