Show AN AND The national of ot In III MM Ion III In Chicago have been listening to lo Al condemning the tue prevalent laxity In 11 divorce The speakers naturally had hlll to spit anti and lilts hiss nt lit what they termed 1 the Mormon hierarchy something that dOM does not exist and ond lies haj not exl they frankly admitted that there la Is not 9 I great groat difference In iii Inthe Inthe the tIme morality which condoned 1 sive polygamy as ns remarriage utter after di dl divorce vorce voree wa II CUI to amount to and ami contemporaneous con polygamy III The Tue Th speakers ers emphasized the tho terri term terrible ble tM growth of ot the tho divorce evil One Ono of oC them a 11 lawyer who had written a n pa paper per Jr on ott the subject which was WAil reed read ho lie himself elt being b prevented from heln present sold Mill that In Ohio for to fc Instance one olle dis ores In III every mm ma was wan tho tito ratio matte In 1870 and am one OHO divorce In III right eight marriages the tho ratio In h 19 The rime president of at the com corn compared pared In the United Unite States to those thouc tho o of ot Canada nIl nn said that in the Dominion of ot Canada dl di divorces were Vore granted In the years C between bel 1807 and cm 1001 omit In I tho United li In tho the amo lamo period there thero wore vero divorces recommend recommended I ed d the Ule serious study of ct the tho problem by anti teachers teacher that the young bo ito to regard lisa las lasus a us 1111 cred The unanimous opinion us ue to a I rem ren remedy renedy edy ed seemed to bo be that divorced tier por lor eons sona should bo considered social out custa One Ono said What Is called coiled tho the divorce problem la Is not lot tho the divorce problem at lit atall atall all It Is IH tho the question of oC re mc remarriage remarriage marriage after atler divorce that hint IH Is worry lag Ing the tho good of ot this country 1 knows known and recognizes the tho fact fae that all nil married people cannot live together there must t be l legalized d sepa lIela separations rations call them heal by any Iny minnie you ou choose and If It this tub were vero all that won Involved In III tho the question It would 1 held ly Iy merit consideration for tur or I venture to think that hut It If neither party to n a 1 di II divorce vorce Voree were Vera allowed to remarry the tIto of ot the thu other othel there thero would not bo be vory ury or many divorces divorce Tho The that lint lies ut lit tIm the root mot of ot all nil this ovll he bc h continued Is IB tho time vory Oi 01 loose of ot opinion n I yet cl to hear henr of or a divorced person flor on ono o LI desiring to remarry who vimo cannot some pome clergyman to officIate at the wedding no matter how hol scam scon nay fin loathsome tho the divorce may have been Another expressed the tho san same thought titus thus Divorcees an or received book back Into high anti and In middle ml llio class cl lii III I with Iti no tho woman toia who wlm ss ii hat hal n a 1 mans e a h nt a wronged her hor children the man inai who lies hils liming Hung u h faithful trusting Wife from tram him bin 11 t i wc vet vettin an tin woman and titus thus Im hn ii Is encouraged t If tr there In Is not notto notto notto to b bl bA a IL national law If It the tho lie way my there ther thereto to 10 IH Is too long lOll smith and devious to be then th n let un Us u keep Ile p our horn homes from rot tho the contamination of ot Immoral dl III In Il iti of or tho the serious I moral specters which that congress und and others by Jy clay and trouble troubie tho the sloop sheep by lIy night would It not lIot lift ha Ii wise who to let tho ho M r mona monh alone alono for tor or the thu time being Thure IBa Is III a cLout about the tho boom hicom and the tho mote which Is h nil alt but forgotten In 11 Incur our cur day ny and generation I |