Show l INFORMATION fORMA TIO WAS AS For Tills Reason HC son Supreme Court Reverses Judgment in Ill 11 Case of State vs Davis Dayis and anti Pryor WERE CONVICTED OF ROBBERY Men Stole Stoic Iii C OH O ro John Johll Job a Daniels am auth Were Sentenced d to 13 ij Years In iii SUite Tito court cout an alt al of ot the tite opinion reversing the thO judgment lower lowr court In 11 tile the case of ot tho the of f Utah vs Va v 1 ml Davis DIla and John Pryor Tho following from tab the tha opinion ion Is la tho tim basis buelA of ot tho the decision of ot tho titu court courtl rite Tho phrase by of ot force 01 or luau Cu Is II a n feature bo be tweel robbery and grand larceny when tho the taking Is I front from the tho person ierson and Ind Is 11 n a 1 material In lit 11 the tho crime of or tub tob bory boty The Thu of ot the tho Information to charge charGo that tito tho taking was WIS by force or four fear U is l hold held to bo be a n i fatal defect The two tO men len were waro charged with wih rob robbing rol bing John Daniels of ot on 01 July H 14 lOit luos and were convicted 1 and to 11 It years III in the thu lie state titto prison An up ap 1 peal was token taken and amid it was contended by y tho the attorneys for tor appellants that thu titu Information mutt did 1111 not charge tho the cilmo ot of as sql t out in tn the tho statutes for Cor or orthe the tho reason that It Lull did lit not charge that hut titi the tile money was taken from Crom Daniels by force or fear tear Tho Tue ho cute case wan WOI argued on 01 Tuesday and amid In iii Uio tho opinion tod today y tue thu court co rt holds that the tite contention of ot ap at appellants ni Is hi good and the tito judg judgment jU ment of ot the tile lower court court The Thu opinion wits WOH written by Justice and anti concurred In ill by Chief Justice Justo and amid Justice |