Show MINIC SUIT AFFIRMED Ct Court o Decision s tn In Case CaM of r Wel vs Davis Et At AI Cuse ule 0 of the n I C A DolO flolo I is Aho AhoA A j The he supreme Crt crt an aea Ion Saturday In the cUe ey ot at Heber M Wel Veils appellant vs Id 1 W Dvis vII and nd C CU CH U H affirming the judgment ot of Ih the court below belo cour The Th In this hl cue case made me application before the United States lOnd Ind olce office for patent for tor the Mountain Mayd and nd Gold net Beet mining claIm claims et it In the West Mountain And the appellant died I an adverse claim claiming 1 a tte title to cr certain mining ground round lale called the Wel Wells Le Lode In cn con conflict flot with lb the grund ground Include included In the application for patent In I support ot of his hla adverb claim Air Mr Well Wells brought Acton action to hi his tt title to th thi In The he respondents denie denied or tt title to the grund ground ad and u as a in defence alleged that the they wr were th the own of Ih the land a and praed for tor an adjudication nd J judgment t to that eff t The C WR I M bJ Judge Judg lUI lilies who foi foUnd 14 In III favor of the Fm Front that judgment ap Par For a reversal for appellant relied upon two pint points Frt First that the ot of loton location were In Insufficient sufficient Indefinite and uncertain and that therefore the they should hould not have been admItted In that the were rr permitted to Show how b by expert testimony that certain work done b by respondents had a tendency to te develop both ot of le the mining claims claim b be belonging longing to then them especially pelal When hen U it WI was not shown bown that suck uck expert witness had ft personal knowledge ot of the cu courses of 01 the veins al although ouNh he generally e tt knew dispute and nd had surveyed une tb the mining lund ground In A As to th the rt pint point lh the Supreme cour court Ind lInde It holl hoIl and aI also hl holds that th the lend second pint W Was not wen well I taken The opinIon was U delvere delivered by District Judg Judge Chief Justice und Justice Miner ThIS SUT SUIT n H n B Brinton Au thorl 1 b the tho CI City DvId David B 13 hu has filed an ton suit arnt t the municipality ot of Bit Salt Lake Land and Water Commis Commissioner Ioner S B D 13 end and hi his deputy Youg Young to prevent the defendants from blocking an n allee alleged public highway In Parlays canyon Te The complaint alf alleges that tb the rd road In question ii a public highway and bu baa bubl bl been uld used by as such for lor years ea that te the defendants stopped topp him from driving a her heard of I alon along the rd road and cm compelled Ie him to go 0 In a roundabout W way to b his dm dam damage as age In the sum lum of oC J 20 The suit ul I is brought to the powers of th the city to prevent stock tak b be being Ing driven along alon th the county rd road la in Parleys canyon 1 so a as to peat boul befoul 11 hut of the waters ot of the cek creek tm from which the cl city derive ala a large percent percentage a age of 01 I iti wate water supply OSIC CASIO In Case or of ot nl al sa s O 0 i A fob Tb Supreme cur court O on Saturday if af tinned the Ibe judgment ot of the Gr b be below low In tb the c case of 01 the Staad Standard Ite Steam Laundr Laundry vs C A Dl Dole Plaintiff to this action brought suit uJ ukla asking be compelled to account for certain yenta etc o of certain real 1 t and personal nal prop property erty employed II in conducting the lan lanI lana dry I and aad that tb the amount round found due b be credited A as redemption ml money to b be to rl redeem tM the fal real et estate tr from foreclosure sale under a Ile mor mortgage p Defendant set Nt up a ad adae and ae averred that b be wu was te the ow owner by pur purchase chai chase anti nd assignment ot of cIn certain not notes executed and delivered to th the T Troy lAundry CP b by O 0 A and E T Wole Woolley to foi th the of the laundry machinery that the note notes provided that tte title to tb the m ma machinery chinery was not nol to p pus until tb they wr wyre In ful full tha that to prevent the taking ot of the laundry machinery the ant WA Wil compelled to purchase them and 1 pay tl the balance cue due O on thorn them neither the Ule plaintiff nor th the makers having pid paid them an and that he alo also paid taxes lau and expenditure for lor on the Plaintiff In It its replIcatIon denied Uie these d ale alleged tha that la lanot the not notes were paid u er r a certain agre uncut made mad with t Judge Jude 1 lilies e b be le fi whom tM the O ease WU was tre tried entered I allowing te the defendant a lan lion I the p chinery for the I lunt ot of the notes note pid paid by him and th the rl real estate tat tot for the n sums paid by n for tor tae taxes and I to pairs iod ud other I u ii Tl The curt court all also bel held Cat Chat the Ibe pta pIa tf II wu nUte to redeem the prote up upon payment ot of such ud several Ie less ll the rental ot r e at tb the rate ot of 64 per n II front from February 1 ian to Jall Jani ry th 11 1500 From m this dere decree and j 1 lament plaintiff a ap pealed hut but thlu the su me eme curt court found no reer error I it P e record and hence the jUd judg nt The Th opinion II t hI he curt court wude was de b by Chief ustice Ju Jul tices Miner and J I thin kIn H JUDO Cases ORseR H easer Juc Judge Saturday alura hues decided the following Wol Wolfe et I ii vs Nicholas Cut Castro ju judgment nt to for Edmund 1 H r vs Cro Castro judgment for defendant David Wot Wolf I et al v vs G Lavignino and aad Nicholas Calo Castro Sou lor d di Hattie 1 If Young oun Tm nt and decree tor or defendant coln le its right to remove the Imp an fixtures Aled by I It on th of plaintiff during the tho u der the lease The he Groosbeck V re Prank Frank M Wilson et 1 01 jud m meat t fOr plaintiff Prank Frank Thomp vp Stephen Hay flays et etl l 1 Judgment for lor quieting hl his tte title to 10 the watt wate In dispute dispute D 13 1 II s J P Lynch ot et Ali al Jud Judgment for tor pit f New J Mining 18 s Alen Alien G 0 Lamou et ali al notion ot of d de to quail Immon overruled HIS W UM nines 1 H le to Court flit Heler Relief Jim James U H Thoma Instituted divorce proceedings arl hI hIs wife Ie Mar Ilsy A Thomas in the district cort court St Sat alleging t that the plaintiff is II an inmate ot of an P Pa where here he I says been confIned for the past live r rs The parl parties to the corn com marre married after aner a slight acquaint inca ance In Oklahoma n a July 3 1192 At that time y h he was a 21 and bl his wife 17 f The Thomas IY my was a weak 1 did at the time of th the maia manage Ie li Re h he dId not know I I It however but fh n I It w was known to he her father 1111 aM other relatives a telegraph ato ator There ii o child a 0 boy now nr nearly sIx Ix yar 01 J ud dared In the cue case of J In Jara W vs Paul PaulK PaulE K E n B Hammer Ju p lIlIes toay today gave v judgment for tf for 18 1100 Judgment for tor I for tor 1 was al also rendered y Judge lilIes today II in the c case ot of a 0 I vi ACt Augast Henegen et al Up Charles White youth of tte eighteen summers wu was I betoN Judge JUdie today on I te charge ot of burglary H He was wal given next Saturday to CO plead plad I |