Show THE DURKEE HEIRS LOSE IOSEt Their Clam Claim Against United Shies ter Pacific Pat fic sonar Ivan u bould I Ia lava a tern bt b by 1 lent c July claa Claire of oC the hen or of Darken Dt DOr of Utah IM for certain barU ot of the IM I etS tit t 1 wIB wal by la Huner ol of tile the IUt rt and aatI tot t a rule rah ot of tile the Gap Data to com dell delicacy of oC that too to he claImant wu was dented denied sold wet Mo based oa ti aft na one OAI ot of whisk wan that oat u 1 la fa tact fact tar tor tbt tb attar I neye at tn the w wu lICK Ilot u tM proper to briar lUlL Full n Its tat lau mated that tM the tuna cold haw have been by the IU 11 Wd Id It wan w strange D that ouch a Croat areat prop arty I HW have beau beeD a 10 lundlad that all trace have Gave hero Loa I II Ile held that Ibe not act th the left with wit the of the t t be acted upon ullOn sad and Ara rat lI ed sad lid that a act sonar be controlled by a Judge In bIn the rh HrIn or of the case OllIe tor had daH to 10 a rule er aa Gap to flow oa why he ahou nt neat dells dellver K er Ute the bold to the almatH a is read to the court urt today MYr MYrthe lb the aen n I Dy by Charles CharI Durk oho ho died 11 In t d and that they M now la III tile or at leNt least were wre seed INn then br b one ot of the Durkee In The flares men In ile I dr defense set out that th the did It alleg who ass the th pain at law aw and I b nor did It Allee Nat laab t ter wan a Wel n 4 The TRe cove O that the I power la In the premal Is II panty purel a one oae |