Show fOSI Y SOT NOT CurI tC loti In a 1 I Batik HAlik Case CaseIn I In an opinion handed down Ibl this after arter afternoon noon In the case CUI ot of J W agent arent agents s 1 the Mount Pleasant Comme Commercial lal nd and SavIng Savin batik bank the supreme court if t firmed the judgment of the trial court This wu was an action to recover SUCIO 2000 alleged tu to have haVI been by plain tilt In defendants bank In the court below WK was whEn defendant appealed The Tb supreme court frem the evidence that no such uch deposit was waa ever Ier made and nd that wu was not th the real Ital party in III the alleged deposit It Is II further held that the plaintiff It at the time I a certaIn draft Wl was made good fOOd by the bank nit Sad d car tam letters lettell were written did not con alder the In any aft wa at liable but the Id Idea of oC holding It was u an n after afterthought thought The opinion W was written by br and concurred In by br Chief Jus tire Dartch and J italics tle MIner |