Show i b bOURT URT D J L A PROMISE 1 Norrell Stands by Ruling In Roberts Gu GilL 1 j I KIJ ND FIN D ul ulf r rI Cie c 1 Will b lIlt I r f S IL D JI 11 Itta na 7 a JOlT O o lut Iut Ot of unlawful fa t appeared befort to r tar fen flU Th of e tb tha WM tut tt th defenda sr a Itt In the Sum um of U or i lieu t tbt b hi be in III the theA I tor A period ot 1 A dayi ita w wu In or orr ord d r thi i bUt bill bUtof of ext ex bond sit Oft appeal wee wa wat t stud ot at MIl T TI I Th Tb entered the Ihl court room a low few l 10 In tb the ut of Ilia attorney Mt lIr Jame 11 M I court had convened Judge Judi Judit t It Ii that thet this was Wai the dAY dy t fr M Mi 1 Hobert end and hi his hon honor or cr It If the wu wee reedY read CI toyIe lole In the if af and said that the court pronounced Judgment h he to ui y yf f t ta few words word then briefly re reI I the history billory ot of Ui the cue cle end and andt ol the Wu to t mUon at the hinds handl of the When the complaInt wu wee med flied In Int Inthe t the Justice court the defendant defend ant with the offense olTen II hw had bad been con conI I L o of hi he wee WILlI In In the city of Weh WehL upon that thit L bad been commend against him h hI he I wrote the county attorney that N 1 It f he hi was hi he would return to Salt Lake without I lion Dopers rs From the first he wa was on hand band to meet the charge thet had bad been ado against him without put pUI tin the State to an any whatever I The defendant had married hIe hi at ai 1 wife prIor to the mant festo lie had endeavored d to 10 keep with withIn withIn In the law In ao 10 tar far as hi had failed I I It wits due to no disposition to 14 the I lw but was wat on account of the pe peI p I relations that prevails r to some Home extent In this thu state Slate Counsel had Informed the county at torny tomy prior to both trials trial that hn would admit for tor the 1 of trial all aI the tech tact that he would say he be could pro and thus avoid the to CI the state Slate ot of TIle There ri II wa was n a In 1 L mind whether the for forth the It severed a elf of time In during If cOunsel there wu wie no law lawi unlawful i I COURT COUnT WAS IN DOUBT II t Even Lse the Court had intimated that It as In doubt I as to tb the macum would permit the Introduction I f showing In baAi 11 II 1 Judge Jade Norrell I r 8 I hay tv tome sum doubt on that t 1 Ij ef law and think It should be bes s 1 upon by th the Court I Mr Ir Moyl ol said td the pro plO vI on the pert of the thi as 1111 practically a pl of guilty so 10 far farIll Ill trouble and expense to the State I re The In tak takIng tnt Ing th coune coree he had bad merely desired I have ban a construction ot at the law and andL L the determination of his hll legal 9 t Involved In tin r PUNISHED II r thought hl his honor should 11 I take Into consideration tb the fact that the marital re hem from hll conviction d deprived him of one of the must im imI In the gift of the State 1 I 1 to say lay nothing of II ha emoluments r 1 That of counsel d wu n a nr afar r tar far reter punishment than the court could Tho Th ot of hie bla marital relations resulting the alrea already l stated was Wat or of th mout r honorable and of the thep p State Stat 1 Ife Ie never had shown a disposition to flagrantly or wilfully disobey the law dl I ot of tb the land The court could well 11 take tW this laoj and existing Into c and be with d defendant t In palling I STAT MEm or OF MR Mn Mr Putnam said Hid It was true a Mr r fI had stated that the defendant Write tret hIm from Washington stating that It If he were charged with an aD cx x offense ht would return without the papers But dired the court to understand that unlawful w wu a tnt mi miOr Or and a man could only be x for a felony 1111 Iii honor was AI with the facts IR in the rear 10 IGne one to the jury jur U upon II a an reed agreed on both occasions at the tte ot of fur tor U the defend defendant aRt ant As Aa stated by Mr Moyl the tie fendt had practically admitted hll hig lk and aad counsel thought Ie ho should be road a an example of There Then n other men In Utah who bad entered Into the abe relationship as the taftt det hut but butt t the wet obeying thi law Tb be df de tt dant was a man of anti antil 0 l In the State 0 of the Importance of the he uc oc I It in tM the community tilt ll I he t a rt TO A In If Mr man m eon convicted If tt Unlawful will esy y here In o OU that III 1st tb Intend to obe obey the la laI law lawI I thu Olat tile Will retrain trees maintaining n I ith their plural It will be a 1 strong tron M 4 ta Ii r whoa oa of ii It maine to to 1 ta taS S a ud sad I think It should hould lit t of thu at thIs fly Dr i J IdI Norren said uld b he had already Idy Idya mao a ruling upon the IU aug d bT r Putnam und and did feel I b like himself II had bad come com to the that thaI hI he might mIt Just as aswell well 11 uk a 0 violators tit of the law what l their utu intention were u as to uk It of k pIo of unlaWfUl cuba I till 11 WU familiar with S z I alae leet In tile cu at bar aad did not k It 11 to cot comment spon pon ponI I 1 I I 1 Harren IbeR thu imposed a is ID ot of I S sis iad ad the thirty d dais stay Itay I Ibee had Win bee granted and thc of oft t the t ap appeal 1 bond bed zed or IJ De Depoty Uty con Ben Hurl jart to toL I IAL AL L court until Monday I |