| Show 1 Th Tb has recently considered a for tor the abolition ot of capital In tNt that Ita State t pro proposition WIll was lost by Q a vote of 4 to II IC Th The narrow cape hu bu reverend mend gentleman Mr Ir Silliman to 4 the tH qUon hi n I a N New York U Lakes the stand that the death th find t tn in UI that who MOOt the qUIet el at a change II i that tbt mode V are and WIe wicked II 11 sMarts that It I t set evident dru that to do with A I In Ih nit 1111 dia contrary to the ut ot God and lId that it 11 I is also allt foolIsh unis I and suicidal run ruin OUI to our ur e and peace arid and to our vet very WI V do not nO i h to tei enter upon the discussion I ii I r fl 11 IU as to the killing of toll tui 1 It t hII be pointed out that It i i nt rI ni to III the I II I question at U t tring the Old T Tee Into tb the dl Modern aI j jg g ot of the or of J Jesus art find or of displayIng their blood theology and or of quoting tb the Id i saying Thine eye ee shah not pit pity mm that I Is the man Inan or woman oman about t I h stoned tu to death or otherwise des I Dt they forjet lD ll lland and wickedly that th they themselves are III the heat arat to dillY deity that the stance now sad lId then are similar The They deny tilt the direct Influence ot of God both bothIn In the Ita state tat and church why then Ihen l Ih they In Insist t un on reta hung hd when influence wag The matter f is ot of much more Import importance ance than ma may appear from a super view In of It In the Mosaic state God was it both the and Sn S1 ireme court To Him cery uy tl ease or of I Could be B appealed aled In the lest I r 1 instance through those thole whom lie Jle had to stand between him the There 1 was no pI of ofa a mistake In the verdict its UI long a as tR the Supreme Judge Jude could bl be approached through those thue lit In the ar In that state tatt It waS III whom horn centered the eU eUie ie and antl Judicial dl dia of If life and tind death among His HII peo lie How can cm any theologian serious of such luch I IT argue from the jurisprudence commonwealth to what ought to be In Inn ina n a n state 1 U the vr of If the argument defeat It ItA itA A much better ulea ot of that mode of dl ot of certaIn criminals was wal made by Mi Mf undra a member ot of the leg III legIslature Jle H said Th The are It a murderOus pM like vie plc Ur Over a year r are arl killed th the sheep III et The fat fact that death th had been in n Maine had really increased d crime haw tell h had taken lit hi brother Into loto Maine to do di him to death In hi alt all had made the attempt to avail vall them themselves ot of that immunity It If that It true tb titer Is reason for th the continuation ot of the death p It If It is II I a fact that the killing ot of dete deters others from commit tiit murder it H must be done clone a a pro protection to society On 00 this Ih line the must mut be debated ad d U decided |
