| Show REGULAR DIVORCE c DAY IN COURT HU HlIs Liberates No less Than ts FiVE And the nOl ero lasted pUll II a noun lit ID less leu than tha Ut this hours boulI and a half hairs tI thin 1 Judge ei I the ent thu Jicie ID ink aled and hap thu number ve tind Ind belan hurdy flar IU and kept up until a fw few mm of I 1 The dt ourt became fir ery wearisome the end Jio much so that Judge 1111 with the tau of the attorneys re fer red a number of the c cues to Clerke and Little The beneficiaries of oda came from the various walks walka or of lit life young and old rich anti and poor those tho w who o ov v work aud those thOle Who dont doht The result rull follows follow AN MI MAN MANDelay N NDel Del Delay V Shaffer ob n a decree ot of d divorce vorce from William J Shafter on the arounds of desertion antI failure to The plaintiff testified that she he the lii In lh this city on onla onlay la lay H 21 1 Tb following August Aut Autt t th ticketed her The last 1 heard of hIm below he was In Topeka amos the obtained a through hit her own efforts dorl and anel the aid n of her parents parent Frederick Swanson to the plaIntiff gave Ave corroborative testimony At the lime Ume the defendant left Itt Lake LAk he was employed at the flit Ornde Orand Western shop II Des heard the tbt defendant was die charged for tor Ig Then Tbt he must mut nave IV bean b n an able bodied man remarked court Yes he w was replied th the t tIn In addition to a decree Mra Shatter wa was also en her maiden malan nanie bae 1 le V Sharkey Ray Bay VAn an Colt was u uh the h plaintiffs attorney MARRIED CARRIED SEVEN SEVIN Failure to te was wal We the ground upon which Clarl a IC 1 Symme ob taiMe a decree ot dIvorce from George R It a miner now employed at t Part Parle City Plaintiff testified that slit b married the defendant In Idaho dunn during I I year 1913 Three bre yea years ago au she Ihl sheI kt I the defendant her Iter and bad since taU tailed to contribute anything her support There Thre Is 11 one olle chIld ot at the marrIage now three years yeara old Martha r Foster terz mother ot of the plain her daughter dauter The court allowed Mrs for forthe the support of the child 1500 GOO aUmon allmon and attorneys f fees which he is II ed 54 to fIa pay at t the rate of 11 a month J 3 n It Bowelle appeared for plaintiff ACTIONS WERE UGLY The husband seeking was u Clinson n it Scott quite a young youn hooking fellow who that h he be behen given hen a deer from Maud aud E Scott on the ground of desertion delolI According to the testimony ot of plaintiff the couple lot got married In this olt city on May n 15 less and nd lived together but a short time Ume I came one day from my work said ald the plaintiff and found the house houa upset anti and my wife Ire Ion done lie He could give no reason why h hi his wife deserted hIm but thought her mother was at the bottom of It Ite IL had bd written to hI his wife since she he left lert him and hd had gone one In person and aDd belled begged hei bel belto to return Mrs Ir Scott however said aId she would not live with hIm again She told plaintiff that she Ibe thought they were foolish for ever ver leI getting Un married seeIng neither of them had bad any money What is II your bula business Inquired Judge Judie Norrell 1 I at the Domestic Dome tlc laundry replied the How much do you yau let get a week the court further Inquired Fifteen dolla dollars was WAI the reply The defendant was al not In InCoUrt CoUrt and Judge Riles ordered that It a subpoena be issued for her Later Mr Jr Scott appeared p are and In answer to the court said Aid the defendants defendant actions were uI ugly and nd they get t along to together together gether Are AI you thinking of 01 marrying some orne someone one else ele asked the court No sir I am not not wu the reply J 1 E DarmEr appeared for plaintiff MANS WIFE Mar Mary L MacLoud MacLeod v vs Norman W was wal the title of next cuo calO called The a neat looking little tittle woman that she he married the defendant at the Cullen hotel this elt City In April 1897 1817 and nd that ever since he be nad contributed but little towards her support because of hi his drunken habits habit He rot got her to mortgage nort her home and with the money he went to Mexico fulco Ha was wa now In Canada Plaintiff said Id she he WI was the mo mother ther of two children by a former mar flag fIre Recently the wrote wroth h her r an Insulting letter In which he be told lold hi his wife she he w was not Jill his equal and ad advised her ber Ib the time limit she he contemplated contemplated plated matrimony to mary Inary a hod car carrIr I J G 0 Weaver said Id he knew t th d Wen Well fort IRvIn leaving Salt Satt Lake kt he WU constantly drunk and ami what L money mODey hi his Wife received wu was f hr mother and through her own efforts Mrs Va was a aN N J appeared In plaintiffs behalf MADE fADE hIM IUM SICK Louise t M Crismon told the tbt court a story tol On May 11 12 she be married Sidney C Crismon and for tor five years of that time he wu was scarcely ever Clver a day sober lOber Once h he come caine home covered WIth blood and nd made i Plaintiff believe he had killed her brother SIn SInthe Since the last tIl baby was u born plaintiff II she he had wIth tainting spells and one day clay after fter she be had come too the tha defendant told her ber her pale pal face made him sick and nd he wanted hI his Wil to pt iet out of his Itla sight J K E Murphy the plaintiffs father corroborated hi his daughter and Mrs Irs Crismon Will was grant nt eel ed a divorce and the custody of three children Attorney appeared for plaintiff ALIMONY AND COUNSEL FEES Judgment for tile the plaintiff l in the ClUe asH of Smith vs Hugh W V Smith was WAi granted on Ute the ground of deter deser ion Uon The cue case wOe heard hard last Iut April before Referee l F W Little LillIe who recommended om mended that Mrs Smith be allowed 1 1 00 alimony at the rate of 10 0 pr per month and anel 90 tee fH A W V wu was plaintIffs I IE E VS DE DB Ada DI De William A Dc 10 during the year 1 its and loc to the testimony of the wife William has hila been ever since r PI Dc was Val given riven a decree the of II a child and the privilege of assuming her maiden name Ida Ada LEFT Ills UIS Attorney D S represented the plaintiff In the ca case of m Vi 1 1 Mrs Burn Durn Burnham hm ham obtained a decree which was wall III all she he asked aked for tor anti glad Ind to get lint Th The parties marled Iii n the rail fall of 1385 and anI In April th the defend defendant ant Int deserted his vite Ite Dumham to lo be connected wIth the Sat Salt Like Lake fire department Ilk Uta parente live In Cleve Cleveland Cleveland land Ohio Uc Burnham Is the mother of three and since the desertion has ha earned hr her living by wa washing IN Jim Jimie Fuller Emily Henrietta In Januar lilt 1111 lid and l years reArs later deserted her tIe De Defore fore leaving h he took his hla wedding ring pawned It and landed In jail n Ii Is now In the Mrs Mr Fuller obtaIned it a decree of 01 divorce from James William and was wal also awarded the custody of their two dren Judge Judie Anderson appeared for tor the lI plaintiff n WANTED TO Mrs 1111 Wary Mary A Stills with tn tests In her ber eyes eye told lold the curt how cruelly her I husband bund Joseph Stills had bad treated her herThe The In this city on 1 June Jaae 7 1 1991 and nd ever since Inte plaintiff eaid the defendant brutally her one hI he said ald to bl his wife Thiede wa was hung for killing killin hi Ida wife and nd I guess uel Ill II be huns hung too toJ Mrs Sollis obtained a decree and Will was me stored lored to her maiden name that of Mray A Jackson There were no chit chil children i dren S W Stewart Was u plaintiffs at t I torney TAYLOR rAY Lon VS TAYLOR My I husband huband has only given me In two to years yer said Hid Mrs Mr Vilate W 0 Taylor in rp reply to lo a question put PUl to tober her ber by her attorney U n S Tinner Mrs Taylor married William A Taylor a 0 tailor by trade In this city on I ebru ary 2 8 1891 1881 and UI have bave two Idren For the tha Pelt pat two rears n the tie de to tIle ot of othi hi his wife and her mother Mrs lIr tarr Mitry Jane Groo bu hi spent I lila III time lid and means mean in III drink Ue IL II isnow now eald to be living In Provo Mrs Taylor wa was grant graat granted ed a decree awarded 1500 alimony In monthly of Il each at attorney torney tees CH and the cul custody y of the two children Other decrees were wert granted tel as La fol follow lows low Neal J 3 Andersen v vs Nettle S J Antler Ander Anderson son on rounel desertion Maggie or M Mitchell vs I Edward Edwrd J Mitchell desertion and fall fail un to provide Charles Charlea C Anderson AndertOn VII vs Barbara Darbara An Anderson derson ground round failure to support Josephine vs va Samuel Simuel Allcock failure to support Margaret Ca Case vs 8 Hyrum II 11 Case a desertion Addle v vs Walter desertion and failure to lo provide Minnie A Marcy lUCY vs henry I I Marcy Marey failure to provide Irene vs Frank W Crt Crismon mon desertion and failure to provide Edith Den lIon vi ft John W IV desertion Annie AnDIe IllUsion vs Edwin i tie te and failure to support YS H A fall UN UI to provide John lieU Jr vs S name hattIe hell lion Thelta Braun vs VI Ieler U R Braun failure to support Matilda vs S Adolph Fan Fagen bern desertion and failure tf td support Chari Charles U II vs S Allot Alice U If Tuck ett et i desertion drUon Mary vs 11 George Wiesman desertion The tae of IRl Webb vs S Wil Wilham lIam ham J Webb was fIU refer referred to Clerk Little tile suit aUlt of Susie S vs Charles CharI M Donolson was U dIsmissed the ease ca of 01 Nettle lUe McDonald s Frank un McDonald wa continued for tile term the cue case of Mary K H Jensen Ss 11 Laws IWI Jensen was Willi referred to Cleric Blair and the ease of Elli Ettle La L Holmes vs J 3 W Holmes w was continued for forlie lie term |
