| Show rh Ih WA w to tile the of ah a to be a aruin an ani 1 tIN tbt Peter to the t i rr ruin m I Ln Ill Th lIU t by Dr 1 ot 01 t tc c 1 II Ij Dr K ic icU aDd U I nt L lInA dud cited as II 11 aUthOrity wil I Ih Jeto be W lId Tl 1 th the In support crt 1 trine that the Ille Dible I Ii not 00 tt of I 2 w tit In Of nt l t 1 pl of old eld are III till t 1111 Isa the of In TIlL r rued two of our RIders labor Ibor labori I Ih t to th It further 80 00 r I r and E D In called Prof BpI To Te I I I And md lIde InquirIes I Y found him to lie be not a aJ I J bat a h I I ht t man ur bout 32 12 years eft of ge geh h It IU iii bud budt t in I Y till In reet re t an and andI I J lie Hl them treel on the wild their Visit Ui thi ta tat t ith 1111 r f the of tie r I th 11 wd il b be d wan wert J th 0 la oS of tb lii can cen cenI I ThIa of thai thaing ng k Is It a oe oer II r the It t I k n wn and I Is smatter of 01 teele secle I it I that tile the I r late lato m about the third ten ell ellI I r Ih t sri era and nd thu 1 15 vIewed lewee as a atti III that h hI had I II ill In III thi ortho It Ii as car Ih recovered sri art n or ol a pol or t epistle let from tro It t to tile I I it J t who w was tb the sa sati u uI I ti j lIu Ia It to flit Ints narrated I make mke It II dr Ii who 0 have the fragments that hit It wu WUk t k ut t PI OP dt James or oi J III I nanu 4 being t the moat probe probeL t L N I I that In a bort tI tIIt time U It 1111 t will h 14 I settled j I j I j at 5 able abl to obtain pot Poe 1 r t bk bilOk entitled En l tr tri i lg lIt A New Mew Gospel I t 11 l lit Iii contains an n account II Ii ser ery of the manuscript a aI r I t h an of 11 tra 11 ilso tb the text sad ld I ti of an alleged of oft t J t to 1 tile the Taller lit b bL L 1 In 10 tb the museum of h l UI III sad now in III 11 University JlII I dati of 01 tI ofT t of T I II t I I teO 1 0 or to toI thO thOi I In the book illig the account given Iven tile the ther r I t I It y t through tile the theS S 1 sad ld 11 wig II cam Into trI of I 11 UR of beta h eta Ill 11 tile I M I I l aY Among them m were two tn In the Io tlc I language le Ii I I of their history eI ci I I Ii L rom from t elta of 11 1 Ill hi kr kes are Ia 11 a bad eon I t wrt tit o F 1 5 11 n and nd tile i I 11 h 1 14 teL tePa The I 10 Papyrus of good fOOd 1 h pages ge I p numbered 1111 Ie e I they f see pati of o a al t I n 0 1 No l fl I hat ay be termed Liz r f I u I It a Io tile U 11 th Ih N Seden of Ott OttI I I h th unit unith Ii h I a of ChrIst i t tinK tI to CO John Joha M Wo 10 C CI I 1 nil d Ud nOd all an I I ether No NoI 0 I I t t pert lIttle litO ann I 11 I tr tm It bee I L 1 r I 5 hIto 1110 that t r I tilt t I i t en th the and uh I I I tb thee let an and Lives 01 h l The he In rl rim free origInal 1 are re t ShoUt about witch T II lit ic 1 I CoptI IU letter I r b maul a n to tM NO t II II ht Hie Ie I I iF I II 10 0 MO MOI I t Ih 1 d dI I lay t III I 1 II la V hsi Ie he Iet t I 11 I to I T 1 i weak l uA 1 I d ft III t out L I cl I n td I h Ih d d us usI I I I itO 1 k n c t I i Ii II It J I h hI I n tide one II rI rIt F 11 tr Ir t Ii I k kni u z I 1 IZ I once tt bri I H 1 r i I vine ne I tit The lI sene ene i tilt the I JuM X t 1 tl WU mt In Mark infer that tile tho two fI v 11 Liy Ih ho bUld h Is I hOe I IIII I I were II II l which h shows 1 III Ii I p that I h t II I wee AS wrItten b in r MInk MArk tIIA t lia U us that tbt JI U took with Ith him Jom Jomes sad d fh th authorship II 11 n lI r men In th the rom om omI rUT ih 1111 I 9 y the Ihl iiI ih l rust at wit with II th tbt epistles nfl An ti ight of Jot nI John and thus Jorn The IllI sem bet between to ti II letar nl uhn but bill favorIng the 1110 Wt We hll In th the spirit In If fl quoted nc wIlting lIn but th Ih t 1 wak Mark Wark lv 81 as 1 II II i of at Thene thinas I have unto nU In m In the ye II I have have han 11 pitI hut hUI be or of good nod ch cheer r t I have me Ih the world John art fl 32 flIn In giving hi his summary the Mys II th points pollitt to the 11 genuIne fact that Itu 1 We iI re with A gospel 11 t II front rom II th 1 lit of nl 1 or of th the Hi ItS III t fifth i 1111 1 tl II tosos his tb Ih that th 11 new 1 has hall a double limit hi his III Ii nce I to us UI I 1 It II a fr I he lIf or of ChrIst t tIt 2 It Is II ii peculiarly or tJ t or of tile the person of ofA A All ibis will It h of 01 to I a groat t many pc Till rue W l iliad to ta t the Joseph at the I of this d dispensatIon tilt hid da wrItings iid lost scriptures of vult vIII to o mankind would bo be brought fort forth N of f th tad sad It for God In III III lii iatt r d days Th wm will no doubt bo many cUa of 01 tried bailed literary oil the words word A of ancient s WhIle It Ii would not 1101 lit be prudent tit to any of these purported without thorough an anto to 10 their at t the same tI tIIt tune It II right to 10 be too nor lse Jr to 10 nI the or of U the past which modern modem research and Un tin UnItt Itt will unfold for tor tile the en of mankind tile iii con of religious history hillory |