| Show MRS OWEN HOULE HOOLE OBTAINS A DIVORCE Wife of Well elL Known Man App Appears In Td ay ayA q e I A l hi R a OIO Suit Stilt for lor lUO Will tuI oJ r t t x 1 it c Owen en Hogle the well fU k a decree her husband be before ION fore l e grounds St of desertion failure to J provide Mrs Mr HOlte Wa awarded d n alimony uDd md 61 tees tee Tu witnesses only oDly weeg in on ur of the ad and the brot broth LI James l Lire Jb fluie that tbt she married Itoe le he defendant at t California 01 O th t I At thI the t time both were wre o 1 U city ad and hv have hived 0 A marriage pest the ten OVir over uses rr hr alo sh h a testified U the deNne fr her r and h lisa lle failed to contribute towards hr her sup aap por or o w were barn to them elD 1 alo that Ar live Ill the he hived In t Mr 1011 having Olec to ioe UP hi his bUln here tr i tad and join her br Its Je titled to do 40 so 1 how bow however ever ver and Mr logIe Ilie said a be ble become Mt on I 1 I that tle the dl di Intended o to boa hr her alto tether ether irs also 11 informed the tha N she we In pr poor health suf luf car ering with th te an affliction 0 a the yea eyes yeaT ar be she he said 1 w wai worth T and had Jl a regular Income of b be twel and Ile her year er James u a brother of the defend Lat that th the parties fl had bael not at ived together for tor the put past Ix ala years rl Mrs Mr lo Instituted separate main proceedIngs last lut October at al alI I eging 0 the Itte of fat facts to which lie t to today toa Th tU In hl hi answer denied hat h he 14 deserted hl his wits wit sad and al alI h I egad t that t to May ml 1 he hd had 14 hIs hh Wt wife o alar a large sum UI of money owned by Mr hire J tn in California lIp to heeD he her fr for life The t plaintiff h he veered agreed to apt te the sum and nd ever trouble hint T The i I to Mrs I to toI tolay I lay dy said 1 was n I h not to t exceed 11 nd al all the she M hal bad received from rom he defendant II in Av fly liars we nd that ess given he her y b tl his I tat Jea bt brother JOi Thi This m I tIe an 0 lat praying tnt an n of the marriage alimony o nd fes t The defendant LIed an each cb and every ery ot of 1 complaint and rant raying ot of that equity hi hW suit b be dismissed for tor forrant Tb The was wa not Dot present in II ourt to today bt bul wu wag represented b by Howat wt Judge lender Henderson and andt nd I ur A t T Sanford appeared In behalf of o drs Ill Jol bale |
