| Show ANt london Ita darel organised attempt to 10 force lorce U the 1 1 of oC lb the government over lh the bill bUl tot prohibiting th sale It of Into liquors to children met with no on June U II The Th general 1 principle ot of ue the undoubtedly support both boUl lit In the hou house and II the country It teaches upon a nil evil kIch Is admitted and should hould no doubt receive a If a one cn can b be discovered Hut But It I by De mean so 10 dear cleir as Sir II Campbell and Ih the temperance party illume allum that thaI this bill I 1 the best poul bl bie mode mOd of 01 removing the or that It is II In itself quite harmless Jt It be treated an an uno unopposed measure although b br a party part accident as Mr Balfour tr ay It contrived to 0 pup Ilip through It Its second reading Ja In tact fact It II 1 studded with poInt Mr on one of them Under the bill t the hi who dot does not ot kao know the boy bots ap age and d hu has no non means n ot knowing It It is punished for tor Serving hIm while the parent who p pre bl does know tIM he age of b his son ii not DOt punished for tor sending g him toe lor liquor London landon Advertiser This bill hu bu beta been urged d Oil on the rov gov maInly b by the tbt teetotalers teetotaler and nd by a certain number numbe of oC members of par Jr who hR beeS mo more or r loss captured by the sentimentality with Ith which It has haa been urged Four of those who signed ed I the he report t ot of tb the I Ion expressly dissented from tb the re recommendation commendation that tat uw Uie e should bould be any ny legislation wIth ant to child claUd III me London Daily DaUr Chronicle W We have mo more than once referred to the of this bill as a ata at and measure DIUN of tf temperance rdo reform which might on one would think be caitie b by acclamation I In In any assembly of human bel beings tortu fortu nit nat enough to In be able ble to en t the necessary reform I In that summary everybody It One Oa hundred and of Mr Bal four for tor But Bat Mr Bal tour foor persisted In the measure u con tro and lid iii that PI plea b ha turned hi beck back on tilt the London Pall Mali Mati GAlletta This bill embraced In a common con cono the sin saline and the itry Iris with Its Ita autocratIc landl landlady wit who would no nomore more permit loose a language within her bar be parlor thin than she h weald their allow Ua the In vision vulon of t the hI pope POP t It IL proceed that Ii on the assumption Oa that eYel every workman is II a tongued wretch wile who taJra take a ft fiendIsh delight lii In thrusting evil ell oem corn upon Can aft any wo worse Insult to a bet be imagined than that London St J Jamss It ii no to 10 tI say that an anla any day la in London Lendon score Un of tn ten dei year ue are guilty ot of jile sipping entailing I Us thIs Mit Int place a aloft love loft for strong drink in II th the place a II lie to excuse tM lbs elton content of the parental Jill jg of 01 ale We are strongly In with the I It of the bill ani with the alf age limit of It If theo the r icat wants hili hi hiale ale let him It It If the pith flub il II l iu thi child let him par Pu till the penalty What w we regret mt It Is the temporary burial of the bill 1111 It If Ifan an huge a mf lur a as tho Austrian l m rj alth bIll can an be pat Iu 11 Ita thiN aln In 3 few curly ur to h flInoi for so 10 aM et ft a I c f fl fw 1 w I I or f to aau l 1161 |
