| Show EQUAliZATION BOARD BY COURT In an opinion written by Justice Frick of the state supreme court theother the theother theother other Justices concurring the case of Rich county against the state board of ot equalization involving the Rich county line is decided against the county The supreme court was vas asked by the tile county to annul a ruling made by the state board of equalization equalization tion that taxation for 68 58 miles of ot Union Pacific railroad is due to Summit Summit Summit Sum Sum- mit county The court refused to annul this ruling holding that the equalization board had the right to give these taxes to Summit county fn inasmuch as aa this thia property had always heretofore been given iven to Summit A Attention te Uon is i called to the fact fach that the boundary line between the counties is not definitely definitely j I determined |