| Show TUG Tho HUB boos of ot deputies daunts of If the theof of iC the chr In of oC t the holt e test kit JIA pas after aCter a 11 u the can fi n 0 relating mating to tu u led e II 53 pr ift adoll adopted br t Uee he boo hou of oC hub s I Thu pal Wl i from frera V c ay 1 U toTted peron nt ext la In I where tt the marriage ha has be bese Jt 1 tor cun existing before t t aut M t the question irm CIn c um up i i In the tho housu t U and was ivas voted upon Ullon by illumes dioceses and anit ardiN the tho entire canon was rejected This leaves lelve tho matter where whore It before beCore although the de Ge debates bates have proved that IllAt there thore Is la a I strong sentiment among amon Episcopal clergymen In favor tavor of ot the of ot the tho Catholic church on the divorce 1110 Question The disposition of the matter In this title way WilY will undoubtedly meet with tho the approval of the tha masses The popular feeling to Is that tha when It U Is II evident that two persons cannot live happily together er Cr r they should hould not lot be bo compelled to con continue continue an existence of oC torment On tho the contrary they the should be given hen another chance to build n a n home under more con coti congenial genial circumstances And so BO strong siron Is this nt that It Is doubt doubtful I IM ful M whether the adoption of a n canon cation by byant any ant couRt change It Still eVery 11 question hM two aides nUll anti the tha other side alda to this title Is II a n strong conviction that the Y for tor obtain obtainIng Ing divorce anti and remarriage l Is largely responsible for tor or the thc flippant manner In which many enter upon uvon the tho marriage relation unit and for Cor the lie t failures resulting It i is II argued were it more to f a 1 divorce diVOre people would think twice tYll before TeeMing upon that step And nd if It remarriage were vero not no so common married t would 1 fight Against the little trials and dif difficulties that often Imaginary proportions If no effort Is made on either side to forgive and Anel forgot Hut nut no matter flatter what want tide side of oC the tho di Ill divorce oreo vorce Is considered It Is evi evident dent that the Increasing laxity Is la one ono of ot the most mOlt serIous arlous evils of oC our time Naturally It II causel cau anxiety among those who are concerned about public morals There Is IC quite a n general de Ge demand demand mand mood for uniformity l in the till divorce laws of the country and that would be beon beon beon on sUp step toward reform But nul moro Im ml Important is n p more correct understand understanding lug ing of ot the tho nature and divine purpose Ilor of oC tho the marriage J It If humanity needs ne ls revelation from Rod God on no hO other point It needs such euch guidance on oa o this question of oC vital Importance People I are beginning to lose sight night of every overy feature of oC the time marriage contract ex ox except celt Us lis eMI civil character They Th y are arc re ro regarding garding it more anti and more moro as ii a 11 civil contract and no more The rho old maxim What Shat God hath bath Joined together let tet no man put asunder Is s difficult to tl find any for tor In the tho modern views I ra of or the marriage state and this departure from tram the tho beginning Is at the time rout root of the entire trouble It Is la the tho anomalous conditions condition prevailing that hose have driven such lIuch men mell as Tolstoi Tol tol to do de denounce marriage as a a sin In anti and to regard celibacy as an nn Ideal With a n correct understanding of PC the tha divine divIno mission minion of oC the two sexes Boxes in their respective res spheres phere difficulties would disappear and anti divorces would be bo rare exceptions liS |
